babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
O.J.'s new book: "If I Did It"
November 17, 2006 - 4:48am
The Toronto Sun had his picture splashed on the front cover yesterday with a screaming headline claiming the book is a confession. I haven't read anything further on it, so that opening paragraph really is my prejudiced first reaction.
Has anyone else heard more?
I love the way the other publishers are self-righteously condemning O.J.'s publisher for taking on the book. I'm betting every single one of them would have jumped at the chance to publish it themselves. [img]biggrin.gif" border="0[/img]
[ 17 November 2006: Message edited by: BitWhys ]
He'll have to use the money to pay for his kids' psychiatric bills.
It's amazing that Fox News, one of the original purveyors of wall-to-wall trial tripe in the Simpson case, now publishes a book like this.
They are shameless.
Some portion? They should get every penny. He might as well have titled the book, "Ha Ha! I Killed My Wife and Got Away With It!"
OJ hasn't paid dime one to the families, who won an enormous judgement against him. Though If the book makes any profits, I doubt that the families would want this blood money. But they could take it away from him and give it to charity, say.
"That bastard, he got away with murder! Of COURSE he did it! Anyone can see that! Okay, the jury didn't think so, but what the hell did they know?"
The LAPD irreversibly damaged the prosecution's case in its zeal to come up with a "good-news" story in the aftermath of the Rodney King scandal. And the prosecution wasn't immune from a bit of sharp practice itself. And the jury smelled a frame-up.
Maybe Simpson DID get away with murder, but it's as much the state's fault as it is the fault of slippery high-priced lawyers or gullible star-struck jurors. I think I'd've acquitted Simpson too on the basis of the evidence presented.
He already sued him for the wrongful death itself, and won. (Civil courts require proof on a preponderance of evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.)
The jury then awarded $25 million in punitive damages, bringing the combined total of compensatory and punitive damages to $33.5 million.
That judgment is mostly unpaid. So the Goldman family can already seize any assets they can find.
[ 17 November 2006: Message edited by: Wilf Day ]
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,230838,00.html
I and most babblers are pleased with this result.
He doesn't. He just has a wallet and his lawyers and accountants probably made him realize this "project" would leave a considerable dent in it what with the bad publicity and lost advertising.
The best thing is that O.J. is being shown for the disgusting sociopath that he is, and now he's not even getting paid for it.
I'm not so sure about that. I think everyone would watch the show, buy the book, and THEN complain about it. [img]rolleyes.gif" border="0[/img]
Seriously, I'm not positive that I would do that. But I don't think I'd condemn someone who did.
[ 24 November 2006: Message edited by: Michelle ]
It seems the Goldmans are now going to publish it themselves?
If you get a chance read Marcia Clark's book "Without A Doubt". Pretty eye opening.