Alexandre Boulerice petition about Gaza
Yes, the language in it is very mild, but at least it is something from an NDP MP. And it does call for an end of the Occupation of the West Bank and of the siege of Gaza.
http://www.jappuie-boulerice.org/gaza_la_paix_est_la_solution_pas_la_des...
Au cours des derniers jours, les voix de la guerre ont pris le relais en Israël et en Palestine. Après des années de souffrance due à l'occupation et le blocus, la population civile de Gaza doit maintenant endurer les bombardements. Depuis le début de l'opération « Protective Edge », plus de 170 Palestiniens ont été tués et plus de 1100 blessés. La vaste majorité des victimes sont des civils. Les rapports préliminaires font état de la destruction partielle d’une mosquée et d’un hôpital.
Plus de 800 roquettes et mortiers ont été tirées depuis la bande de Gaza en direction de la population civile d'Israël. Les sirènes sont depuis devenues une routine quotidienne dans pratiquement toutes les régions d'Israël. Les gens ont besoin de se mettre à couvert dans des abris souvent plusieurs fois par jour. La plupart des roquettes ont été, jusqu'ici, intercepté en plein vol par un système de contre-mesure appelée Iron Dome ou sont tombées dans des zones inhabitées. Aucun décès n'a eu lieu à ce jour et quelques centaines de personnes ont été traitées pour des blessures, la plupart d'entre eux en état de choc.
Le bruit assourdissant des missiles et des roquettes doit cesser. La population civile mérite calme et sécurité. Il n'y a qu'une seule solution pour atteindre cet objectif pour les Palestiniens et les Israéliens: mettre fin à l'occupation de la Cisjordanie et le siège de Gaza et de négocier de bonne foi.
Il est temps que les voix de la paix se fassent entendre à nouveau. Le Canada devrait être parmi ces voix.
Actually I think it is a good tone. Too strong may have a reduced effect.
It is certainly a very positive move.
It's better than nothing. I always liked Boulerice. I hope Mulcair doesn't slap him down for this.
Here is the disgusting whitewashing of Israel that Mulcair and his trusty Paul Dewar are still vomiting out:
If you noticed some mention of Israeli mass murder of Palestinians, please help me find it.
Has any party condemned the mass murder yet?
we need more of people like him in the NDP
So why is Hamas firing rockets at Israel at all and provoking a retaliation? What purpose does it serve to their cause to be doing this?
So in other words Hamas and Netanyahu have a co-dependent relationship. You are essentially saying that Hamas fires rockets into Israel because it WANTS Israel to bomb them in retaliation to help fulfill some elaborate 5-dimensional chess game with the Fatah in the West Bank etc...
Libby Davies just posted the following on her fb page:
[edited to remove inaccurate info about Charlie Angus's fb comment that was not subsequently removed]
Bingo.
I can't speak for the motivations of psychopathic religious zealots (and yes, that means both Israel and Hamas) who by definition don't have anything to do with the reality-based community I'm most familiar with. But from a historical and strategic perspective, that's what Hamas has to gain from provoking a disproportionate response, just like the IRA gained more from British military internment camps than it did from the Irish civil war. Even bin Laden said that his goal was to provoke the US into a massive overextension of wars in Islamic countries that would stoke hatred among Muslims. Boy, did he ever nail that one.
I am impressed that the caucus is speaking up and I appauld them. They are so much better than the McKay/Dewar statements.
If only I knew what faction was actually firing the rockets it would make it a better guessing game about their possible motivation. But hey why don't we turn this good news thread into a discussion about the evil intent of the victims
Just to correct that misinformation: it's still there https://www.facebook.com/charlie.angus.58 as of 7/15/2014 and was shared 32 times.
The news from Gaza is so horrible that it is grotesque to call any aspect of it "good", but I'm very glad that Alexandre, Libby and Charlie have spoken up and spoken out!
where is the link to the quote from Libby Davies?
I cant find it. do you have to be his friends to see it? It might as well not be there, because its too hard to find. Sorry. not good enough. I can't find the comment from libby davies either.
Apologies, my Friend Sid Shniad had made a post on fb to the effect that the comment was removed, and that those of us who appreciated the comment should bombard the NDP with our outrage that the comment was removed. Not being fb friends with Charlie Angus, I had no way to confirm Sid's claim; I trusted Sid enough to take his post at face value.
I stand corrected.
I notice that not one LPC partisan on this board has posted in this thread to congratulate NDP caucus members for taking this stand. My take away of this is that while we "leftists" on this baord get lectured incessantly about "being partisan", for them, its entirely about partisan. Actions speak louder then words. If I am wrong in making this observation, show me.
That the NDP can come out with language even as strong as this in the modern Drone Complex shows how much public opinion has shifted against Zionist Israel. If you read a very old book with a jaundiced eye you can see where this is going. "I trample nations under my feet, and I will destroy Israel if you have worshipped idols". This is the point where Israel goes from having the whole world on its side to having the whole world against it.
The point that Zionist Israel can catch most of the rockets out of the sky, and that they have a network of bomb shelters which not even London or Berlin had in the 1940s, does not make it 'war'. To date, 196 Palestinians have been killed, and 1 Israeli. As the IDF goes into Palestinian territory, the Israelis will incur more casulaties.
To quote:
Eidah Chareidis Rabbinical Court of Jerusalem Condemns Murder of Palestinian Boy July 7, 2014
The Eidah Chareidis, the non-Zionist independent rabbinical court of Jerusalem, published a letter today condemning the brutal murder of Mohammed Abu Khder, a 16-year-old Palestinian boy from Shuafat.
While expressing great pain over the murder of the three Jewish boys, Gilad Shaar, Eyal Yifrach and Naftali Frankel, the Eidah stated that "the demand for revenge is not consistent with the directives of our holy Torah."
I have to say Montrealer58, and as a Jew, while I am not a "Zionist", at least in the sense it is known, I am to say the least "uncomfortable" with your using the expression "Zionist Israel". I am against Israel, as a modern, Democratic State, and I might add the only one in that part of the world, raging this kind of war on what are really defenceless Civillians. But lets be careful, to ensure that we are condeming is this kind of violence, not the entire state of Israel, or its people, whom I might add, overall, are growing tired of this incessant Israeli military adventurism. Going after Israel, for being a "Zionist State", is not the same as being against that State's misuse and abuse of its military power against a small group of radical terrorists, who hide behind the skirts of women, and the bodies of children. Let's keep our eye on the ball, OK?
You expect partisans of the Liberal Party to praise someone for criticizing Israel? The Liberal Party loves the Israeli right-wing zealots and supports them all the time. So does Harper. So does Mulcair.
Why the f*** would any supporter of Justin Trudeau congratulate Alexandre Boulerice for having the guts to call for an end to the occupation of the West Bank and Golan and Jerusalem, and the siege of Gaza?
Boulerice is the only one so far to take a public stand in this sense, as far as I have seen. Charlie Angus very correctly used the word "thuggish" about Harper, his comments were private (although I'm happy to see that the mainstream media picked it up and quoted it in public). Hopefully Mulcair won't force him to do a public mea culpa.
Unfortunately Libby's comments - if she actually made them - have not yet gone public. She's been hurt before, and she needs to be careful.
Unionist, the only point I was making that we see with this thread how much in a real light the idea of "non-partisan" Liberals is just a fake premise thrown out there by LPC leaning supporters, just like those who post on this board in an attempt to convince us that it is about "non-partisanship", not ideology. Where are their supportive comments? No where, because they weren't made by Liberals. They were made by crazy "leftists", and everyone knowns, crazy leftists are unfit to govern.
Arthur - I gotcha - but Liberals are unregenerate supporters of Netanyahu. They are just as nervous about Boulerice and Charlie Angus and Libby Davies as Harper is.
By the way, here is what Justin Trudeau, ally and friend of war criminals, had to say about the current situation (sorry if it's been posted before):
Shakespeare had this scumbag nailed:
My tables—meet it is I set it down. That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
NAILED IT UNIONIST! That Trudeau is a double-talking weasel who'll smile, all the time driving the knife further in your back.
Tell me Arthur why Israell is a democracy but Turkey our NATO ally is not?
Israel is a religious state. Both it and Iran hold elections and then their governments treat their citizens differently depending on their religion. If they are democracies it is a word with no meaning.
Here is mushy piece of fluff from Libby's website that repeats the party line. I do so much miss the old Libby who used to stand with the oppressed.
http://www.libbydavies.ca/aggregator/sources/1
The point of view of anti-Zionist Jews is compelling. The Halevi Verdict is a good start. There are some good books available for free download on the Internet, including "Perfidy" by Ben Hecht, which covers the case.
I am not lumping innocent people, the land, the monuments, the religion or the history of the physical place in the vicinity of Jerusalem (and even the constitutional entity of the State of Israel according to International Law and UN Reslutions) into Zionist Israel. What is Zionist Israel is the rogue state led by Netanyahu. And there is a Zionist movement tracing back to Herzl in the 1800s which it proudly claims lineage from.
I agree with Arthur Cramer that the Trudeau statement is disgusting but almost as disgusting is the official NDP Dewar/Mulcair statement. No mentioning of blockade, no mentioning of occupation. I would prefer Charlie Angus to rail against Mulcair and Dewar rather than against Harper, it might actually do something.
While Boulerice is mild but OK, if you want to know what a party with principles would say about this disaster look at Quebec Solidaire website
www.quebecsolidaire.net
From cbc.ca :
John Baird condemns Hamas rejection of ceasefire with Israel
[...]
Currents, Québec solidaire has always been principled about this issue. I raised the question of the Boulerice petition, because, mild though it is, it does represent a break.
Netanyahu and the Likud party are actually descended from the Revisionist Zionist dissident movement that rejected the original Zionism of Herzl because it was too weak and liberal-minded and made too many allowances for minority rights etc... Likud's spiritual godfather is not Herzl but a horrible little man named Vladimir Jabotinsky founder of the Revisionist movement who admired Hitler for being a strong leader (if only had hadn't been anti-Jewish).