babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Next Federal NDP Leader

Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

 It likely depends on how bad things turn out tonight and how many loses the NDP takes tonight, but I think we all know someone was going to start a thread like this.

 Personally I'd be sad to see Tom go, I really like and respect the man and he would have made a legendary Prime Minister, and it breaks my heart that will never see that day, but I've had my heart broken in politics before and likely will again.

 To stay Tom likely needs to get 25% of the national numbers and dominate Quebec, even then his staying isn't certain.

 I have no regrets in supporting him fir leader, anyone else and we'd be in single digits.

 So in the Event that he doesn't who do you see replacing him?

 I'm thinking Alexander Boulrice, if he keeps his seat, would likely make a good leader if he can dodge the ghosts of seperatism past.

 Who ever it is will have to be able to appeal in Quebec which cuts down on the rest of Canada choices. Not to zero, but it eliminates alot of choices.

 Peter Julian or Nathan Cullen perhaps.

 Chow will be likely to win her seat back so that might be out.

 

Comments

Ciabatta2
Offline
Joined: Jan 23 2009

Boulerice, Leslie (if her French is good, and if she actually survives.)  Julian is a snooze.  Cullen's rapprochement with the Liberals was pointless.  If, for some reason, the NDP gets wiped out in Québec, then Charlie Angus.  That guy was your next leader...until 2011 happened.


Pondering
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2013

Niki Ashton would be an inspired choice.


Sean in Ottawa
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2003

Pondering wrote:

Niki Ashton would be an inspired choice.

Well we agree on one thing besides the importance of water to humans


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

Pondering wrote:

Niki Ashton would be an inspired choice.

 

 No offense, but I'll count as a strike against her, given your just posting in this thread to kick us while we're down.


Malcontent
Offline
Joined: Jul 5 2012

Nathan Cullen wouldget my vote.


Aristotleded24
Offline
Joined: May 24 2005

First let's see if it's a majority, because if it's a minority then the NDP makes itself irrelevant. Having said that, if Trudeau does come in first and Harper steps down, that will buy the NDP some time, but the party would have to move quickly. If it's a majority the party has a little more breathing room.


Sean in Ottawa
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2003

Brachina wrote:

Pondering wrote:

Niki Ashton would be an inspired choice.

 

 No offense, but I'll count as a strike against her, given your just posting in this thread to kick us while we're down.

I have been talking about her as a potential leader for the last couple days.... She would be a good choice.

 


Webgear
Offline
Joined: May 30 2005

At this rate, will the NDP even have a seat in the HoC?


welder
Offline
Joined: Dec 1 2009

Whomever it will be,they will be younger...


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

 Possibly, I like Nikki, I guess I should hold Pondering against her. Still I don't know if we can sell Nikki in Quebec, I know its not far, but who ever we chose has to be able to win over and become highly respected in Quebec, possibly very quickly, that means either someone that we know can have massive charisma like Nathan Cullen or has good Charisma and comes from Quebec. And survives the night with thier Career in tact. That will severely limit our choices. Hell at this point I don't know if Nikki will keep her seat, she did lose to a Liberal once before.


Malcontent
Offline
Joined: Jul 5 2012

Webgear wrote:

At this rate, will the NDP even have a seat in the HoC?

 

The only two sure ones are Vancouver East and Nathan Cullens..


welder
Offline
Joined: Dec 1 2009

Pierre Ducasse ran in the '03 leadership race....Is he available?


JeffWells
Offline
Joined: Dec 15 2003

I'm pulling for Boulerice.

We need to shift left, hard (at least by Canadian measure), and I believe he could be the one to do it.

 


welder
Offline
Joined: Dec 1 2009

Going to the Left is a good idea...The reason is pretty simple..It's because there is a shift of consciousness goig on about the last 35 years of the prevailing economic ethos..Bernie Sanders popularity is one point of light...And frankly,the Liberals aren't going to go to the Left at all as they are going to maintain the economic status quo..And probably for the next 4 years...And speaking truth to power about this is going to be very important...


Sean in Ottawa
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2003

The party members will not hold losses this time against the next leader. But they will want a generational change.

Niki speaks 5 languages.


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

 I agree, I'm leaning towards Alexanxer Boulrice myself, if he survives.

 


Sean in Ottawa
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2003

Megan Leslie will be back I assume in the next election.


Newfoundlander_...
Offline
Joined: Aug 22 2011

Nathan Cullen is impressive but his big thing in the leadership race was cooperation with the Liberals. That doesn't make too much sense now. 


Malcontent
Offline
Joined: Jul 5 2012

Newfoundlander_Labradorian wrote:

Nathan Cullen is impressive but his big thing in the leadership race was cooperation with the Liberals. That doesn't make too much sense now. 

 

true now but at the time it did.  I think he would be a great PM.


Arthur Cramer
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2010

Pondering, I have no interest in who you think should lead the NDP.


Arthur Cramer
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2010

I want Tom to stay. The NDP doesn't knife its leader in the back like the LIbs and Cons. Give your heads a colletive shake folks. For my money, the question I want to ask is what the hell is the matter with all of you? Buck up! Buck up, get a grip! Chirst, what the hell is the matter with all of you? WHY are you playing thsi silly game for the Liberals Buck up; remember what Jack said, "don't let them tell you it can't be done"! Come on! Buck up now!


Hunky_Monkey
Offline
Joined: Jun 11 2004

Peter Julian.  Fluently biligual with a strong understanding of Quebec.  Hopefully, Quebec still holds a good number of MPs for us.


josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002
Peter Julian.

josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002
Newfoundlander_Labradorian wrote:

Nathan Cullen is impressive but his big thing in the leadership race was cooperation with the Liberals. That doesn't make too much sense now. 

Cullen is Mulcair with less hair. They need to distinguish themselves from the Liberals by moving back left.


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

 A defeat I can handle, something like what happened to Andrea Horwath, but this is looking like it could be Adrian Dix territory.

 The question is can Mulcair survive such a defeat. I'm not against him staying, he's been a good leader, until about Septermember where he listened to bad advise. At the very least Brad, McGrath, and co. are done, they're advise helped collaspe the house that Jack built.

 If this had been another time period, but alot of people had expectations this time and dreams, so I don't know if Mulcair will stay, but if he does there will have to be massive changes and self reflection.


Malcontent
Offline
Joined: Jul 5 2012

Arthur Cramer wrote:

I want Tom to stay. The NDP doesn't knife its leader in the back like the LIbs and Cons. Give your heads a colletive shake folks. For my money, the question I want to ask is what the hell is the matter with all of you? Buck up!

 

Yet Tom has lost all that Jack built.   The NDP could be back to a third party rump party after tomight.


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

Arthur Cramer wrote:

I want Tom to stay. The NDP doesn't knife its leader in the back like the LIbs and Cons. Give your heads a colletive shake folks. For my money, the question I want to ask is what the hell is the matter with all of you? Buck up!

 I respect you're loyalty AC, but this is a major route, not a set back and I don't know if Tom is the right leader for the Bernie Sanders/Corbyn era.


Arthur Cramer
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2010

Malcontent wrote:

Arthur Cramer wrote:

I want Tom to stay. The NDP doesn't knife its leader in the back like the LIbs and Cons. Give your heads a colletive shake folks. For my money, the question I want to ask is what the hell is the matter with all of you? Buck up!

 

Yet Tom has lost all that Jack built.   The NDP could be back to a third party rump party after tomight.

So? My old man never folded as a New Dem, and neither will I. Screw the Libs! Screw the Cons! Ready? Aye! Ready!


Hunky_Monkey
Offline
Joined: Jun 11 2004

It's just Atlantic Canada this point.  Liberals were always sky high here.  We'll see how the rest of the country votes.


Hunky_Monkey
Offline
Joined: Jun 11 2004

It's just Atlantic Canada this point.  Liberals were always sky high here.  We'll see how the rest of the country votes.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments