babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Which way forward for the tar sands?

Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

*


Comments

Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Notley wows business leaders with pro-oilsands speech

Quote:

“Expanding existing oilsands projects, establishing new ones and pioneering advanced technologies — all this requires spending on a large scale,” she said.

“We will maintain a warm welcome for investors and uphold their right to earn fair returns … Alberta will continue to be a healthy place for private investment under our government.”

She said that, for more than half a century, “Albertans have been coming up with unconventional solutions for an unconventional resource, so we can extract, handle and ship it responsibly, to the very best of our abilities.

“I’m here today to emphasize that the province has a government determined to defend this advantage by being constructive at home, and by building relationships around the world.”


NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

NDP=No Difference Party


NorthReport
Offline
Joined: Jul 6 2008

What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.

Do those vehicles ride on air or do they use oil and gas? And I know we have to reduce GHG. Just askin'

 

 

 


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

NorthReport wrote:

What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.

I don't recollect that. When would I have said such a thing?

My only question is this:

Did Ms. Notley express these sentiments during the election campaign? Yes or no?

If yes, then I'd say she has some sort of mandate to support and expand private investment in the extraction of bitumen (even though my position would be contrary). But why would the NDP champion such a thing? The federal NDP certainly doesn't.

If she didn't - then it's kinda sorta like campaigning from the left and governing from the right.

Either way, not very promising. But, maybe she was misquoted.

 

 

 

 


NorthReport
Offline
Joined: Jul 6 2008

And things are usually more complicated than headline news

Les Leyne: 1995 decision ensured our water supply

But it took a pitched battle with environmentalists who fought the project to the end and a huge political argument that eventually spread to the provincial government. That stalled the project through the worst drought in years and the water supply was on the brink of crisis before the work was finally finished.

The saga comes to mind partly because of the coast-wide drought that could drive other communities to the same sort of crisis this summer. It’s also worth noting in light of two other major public projects that have gone sideways lately.

http://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/columnists/les-leyne-1995-decision-...


quizzical
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2011

Unionist wrote:

NorthReport wrote:
What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.

I don't recollect that. When would I have said such a thing?

My only question is this:

Did Ms. Notley express these sentiments during the election campaign? Yes or no?

If yes, then I'd say she has some sort of mandate to support and expand private investment in the extraction of bitumen (even though my position would be contrary). But why would the NDP champion such a thing? The federal NDP certainly doesn't.

If she didn't - then it's kinda sorta like campaigning from the left and governing from the right.

Either way, not very promising. But, maybe she was misquoted.

yes she did. at a responsible rate. and i'm not going looking for a quote as a search will find the several times it was repeated.

the only difference was building refineries for the product to ship out instead of raw. i guess  her use of "handle" indicates building refineries  because there's no other "handling' of it.


Pondering
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2013

NorthReport wrote:

What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.

Do those vehicles ride on air or do they use oil and gas? And I know we have to reduce GHG. Just askin'

Even if that were true what difference would it make? The argument that if you drive a car or use oil you can't be against the oil sands, or that your reasons can't be effective, is ridiculous.

If I argue against pedophilia and you find out later that I am a pedophile it would make me a hypocrite but it wouldn't negate my arguments against pedophilia or make pedophilia okay.

If, for the sake of argument, Unionist defended government intervention to save union jobs in the car industry, he still wouldn't be a hypocrite for condemning the oil sands. The oil sands are a particular target because the extraction method is far more energy intensive and environmentally damaging than acquiring oil from other sources where it is closer to the surface and not mixed with sand.


NorthReport
Offline
Joined: Jul 6 2008

Pondering you are not fooling anyone.

The ONLY reason you are posting in this thread is you as a Liberal are trying to attack Rachel Notley and the NDP.


epaulo13
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2009

..txs unionist for the thread. we have come to a point where the crisis around us has become unbearable. austerity and extraction 2 heads of the same beast while climate is a 3rd. what a disaster. for now the expansion of the tar sands has been curtailed. not halted though i don't believe. the demonstration in toronto last weekend points to a growing resistance to any further expansion as well as austerity. at the same time presenting alternatives that deserve equal time as those solutions proposed by political parties..they are that compelling. we will see how that works out but for now pipelines are on very shaky grounds. we have that.


epaulo13
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2009

..this resistance is inclussive. and it cuts across all lines. the 99% that  has power and effect

Harper support buckles in B.C.

Results of polling in four key British Columbia ridings suggest support for the governing federal Conservatives may be buckling in the province as widespread unease with oil tankers takes hold, according to an Insights West poll published Friday. The NDP surge seen in national polls is borne out by significant voter support for Tom Mulcair as prime minister, even in traditionally Conservative ridings where a full-throttle three-way race is complicated by strong support for the Green Party.  According to the poll commissioned by the citizens’ group Dogwood Initiative, Conservative candidates now trail their rivals in all four selected ridings, although the races are tight on the North Shore. Three Conservative incumbents who had garnered over 42 per cent of the vote in 2011 are currently polling below 25%. The Liberals lead the Conservatives in the three urban ridings, while a fourth and newly distributed riding in South Okanagan West Kootenay has the NDP far in the lead. The undecided vote ranges from 21-30 per cent in the four ridings. 


Pondering
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2013

NorthReport wrote:

Pondering you are not fooling anyone.

The ONLY reason you are posting in this thread is you as a Liberal are trying to attack Rachel Notley and the NDP.

I never even mentioned Rachel Notley, the NDP, or the Liberals. Any premier of Alberta has to support the oilsands or they will be thrown out of office even with a majority. There would be riots if Notley said anything about ending the oilsands. It's the people that have to stop the oilsands and with a little help from the dive in oil prices people are doing a pretty good job.

One option would be to build a refinery in place or close by but those are very expensive, the time may be past for such things. Governments will not shut down the oilsands unless the people demand it and even then they might not unless physically stopped. It is a combination of the people and the marketplace that will determine the fate of the oilsands.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005

It's interesting that while we face a global choice about survival of the planet vs. self-destruction, there are some people whose main interest is to cheerlead for one pathetic fucking political party or another. This is a fairly troublesome sign that humanity is too stupid to last.

 


epaulo13
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2009

..the empire is crumbling under the weight of it's own rot. all they really have is the batton while going out in a fit of rage.

eta:

..i can't find the video any more because the the toronto march site has removed them from public access. but something that i think is extraordinary took place. a first peoples spokes woman offered up a new deal. we will continue to block the pipelines but in return you must support their struggle to end colonization.


quizzical
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2011

Unionist wrote:
It's interesting that while we face a global choice about survival of the planet vs. self-destruction, there are some people whose main interest is to cheerlead for one pathetic fucking political party or another. This is a fairly troublesome sign that humanity is too stupid to last.

i feel much the same sometimes.

i see this as more of a harm reduction strategy until AB workers get used to the fact  you don't need 10,000.00+ a month to live on, read blowing it on sfa, and destroy the environment while belieiving you have the absolute right of privilege to do so.

at least with this government there might be hope of harm reduction gaining traction under the others never would happen. no hope at all.  i got an eye opener living in Grand Prairie for over a year.  'stuck on stupid' doesn't cover it.

 


epaulo13
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2009

Assembly of First Nations to host national energy forum in February

The future of Canada’s two largest pipeline projects hinges on the cooperation of First Nations throughout the country.

With billions of dollars and swaths of aboriginal territory at stake, the Assembly of First Nations will try to leverage their legal rights and force a negotiation with Canada’s energy producers and the federal government. AFN National Chief Perry Bellegarde said Tuesday he plans on hosting a national energy forum in February with the goal of getting big oil, Ottawa and First Nations at the table.

But some say the pipeline issue can’t wait until next year and that aboriginal chiefs have to unite and resist the expansion of Alberta oil sands development across Canada. The debate illustrates the complex relationship between the federal government, First Nations and natural resource exploitation....

quote:

In Kanesatake — a Quebec Mohawk community near Montreal — opposition to the Energy East project could also play itself out in the courts. The proposed pipeline would pass through the northern edge of the Mohawk settlement.

“We won’t roll over for anyone,” said Kanesatake Grand Chief Serge Simon. “Your pipeline violates my community’s laws and if you want to take me to court, go for it, the judge will get an earful. … We can’t stand alone, we’re forming an alliance with the (Quebec) Innu and communities in British Columbia. Let’s form a vice between east and west and let’s start squeezing them in.”

Simon has previously said his people will form barricades to prevent construction of the pipeline.


epaulo13
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2009

..here's something about the innu that grand chief simon speaks of forming an alliance with.

Quebec Innu claim key legal win in fight for compensation from Iron Ore

Two Quebec Innu communities say they have won a crucial legal victory in their battle for $900-million in compensation from Iron Ore Co. of Canada.

The Quebec Court of Appeal, the province’s highest court, has refused to hear an appeal of a September 2014 Quebec Superior Court judgment that rejected a motion to dismiss the $900-million lawsuit brought by Iron Ore’s parent Rio Tinto Group.

The Innu First Nations of Uashat Mak Mani-Utenam and Matimekush-Lac John said on Wednesday the decision is a “great legal victory.”...


quizzical
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2011

largest oil spill in history was found yesterday just south of Ft McMurray.


Doug Woodard
Offline
Joined: Mar 30 2005

No long-term future in tar sands, says Alberta's premier:

http://gu.com/p/4cpkb/sbl

 


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments