Which way forward for the tar sands?
*
Comments
And things are usually more complicated than headline news
Les Leyne: 1995 decision ensured our water supply
But it took a pitched battle with environmentalists who fought the project to the end and a huge political argument that eventually spread to the provincial government. That stalled the project through the worst drought in years and the water supply was on the brink of crisis before the work was finally finished.
The saga comes to mind partly because of the coast-wide drought that could drive other communities to the same sort of crisis this summer. It’s also worth noting in light of two other major public projects that have gone sideways lately.
http://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/columnists/les-leyne-1995-decision-...
NorthReport wrote:What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.I don't recollect that. When would I have said such a thing?
My only question is this:
Did Ms. Notley express these sentiments during the election campaign? Yes or no?
If yes, then I'd say she has some sort of mandate to support and expand private investment in the extraction of bitumen (even though my position would be contrary). But why would the NDP champion such a thing? The federal NDP certainly doesn't.
If she didn't - then it's kinda sorta like campaigning from the left and governing from the right.
Either way, not very promising. But, maybe she was misquoted.
yes she did. at a responsible rate. and i'm not going looking for a quote as a search will find the several times it was repeated.
the only difference was building refineries for the product to ship out instead of raw. i guess her use of "handle" indicates building refineries because there's no other "handling' of it.
Notley wows business leaders with pro-oilsands speech
NDP=No Difference Party
What about the financial support the Canadian government gave the car industry to try and keep people working. Unionist defended that if I recollect.
Do those vehicles ride on air or do they use oil and gas? And I know we have to reduce GHG. Just askin'
I don't recollect that. When would I have said such a thing?
My only question is this:
Did Ms. Notley express these sentiments during the election campaign? Yes or no?
If yes, then I'd say she has some sort of mandate to support and expand private investment in the extraction of bitumen (even though my position would be contrary). But why would the NDP champion such a thing? The federal NDP certainly doesn't.
If she didn't - then it's kinda sorta like campaigning from the left and governing from the right.
Either way, not very promising. But, maybe she was misquoted.