babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

The Real Reason General Flynn Was Forced to Resign

Webgear
Offline
Joined: May 30 2005

The Real Reason General Flynn Was Forced to Resign

http://www.anonews.co/general-flynn-resign/

"In reality, Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak was merely the excuse that establishment neo-cons and neo-libs from both parties were desperately searching for. They wanted him gone from the very beginning. This was a deep state coup".


Comments

alan smithee
Offline
Joined: Jan 7 2010

Flynn is an InfoWars conspiracy theorist and believed that Islam and Christianity are at war. He's as big of a clown as his former boss. Good riddance,asshole.


6079_Smith_W
Offline
Joined: Jun 10 2010

Because he lied. Or because he decided to take the fall.


josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002

Deep state coup?  Is that like deep dish pie?


Webgear
Offline
Joined: May 30 2005

alan smithee wrote:

Flynn is an InfoWars conspiracy theorist and believed that Islam and Christianity are at war. He's as big of a clown as his former boss. Good riddance,asshole.

All very true however I think the Anonymous article points out some very good points about who and why.


Webgear
Offline
Joined: May 30 2005

josh wrote:

Deep state coup?  Is that like deep dish pie?

This is a new catch phrase, sort of like “coloured revolutions”.

 My understanding the phrase is to cover “the unnamed and unseen public government employees that saves the state from collapsing.”

 


bekayne
Offline
Joined: Jan 23 2006

josh wrote:

Deep state coup?  Is that like deep dish pie?

#pizzagate

 


bekayne
Offline
Joined: Jan 23 2006

alan smithee wrote:

Flynn is an InfoWars conspiracy theorist and believed that Islam and Christianity are at war. He's as big of a clown as his former boss. Good riddance,asshole.

And lusted for war with Iran.


voice of the damned
Offline
Joined: Sep 23 2004

Webgear wrote:

josh wrote:

Deep state coup?  Is that like deep dish pie?

This is a new catch phrase, sort of like “coloured revolutions”.

 My understanding the phrase is to cover “the unnamed and unseen public government employees that saves the state from collapsing.”

 

Except that as originally used by a certain type of left-winger, it seemed to mean anything the state does in secret, especially if it somehow involves subterfuge or crime. As such, it's been used to include things like the Bay Of Pigs, even though that wasn't preventing the American state from collapsing. (It failed, but the state is still there.)

The past few days, I've seen it used in a more complimentary sense, but with the meaning that you ascribe to it, something like "The permanent members of the bureaucracy who resist illegitmate pressure from interloping elected officials." Which I suppose might verge on subterfuge, though as I say, the intended meaning really does seem to be more positve. We're supposed to be glad that the CIA is refusing to share intel with Trump, for example.   

The place I remember seeing this complimentary usage was Slate.com, whose writers sometimes tend toward the slapdash. So they might not have been aware of its previous negative connotations.


6079_Smith_W
Offline
Joined: Jun 10 2010

bekayne wrote:

alan smithee wrote:

Flynn is an InfoWars conspiracy theorist and believed that Islam and Christianity are at war. He's as big of a clown as his former boss. Good riddance,asshole.

And lusted for war with Iran.

Yup. all the more reason (as some articles have speculated) why it doesn't make sense that he'd do this on his own. So who do you think told him to?

 


wage zombie
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2004

josh wrote:

Deep state coup?  Is that like deep dish pie?

Webgear wrote:

This is a new catch phrase, sort of like “coloured revolutions”.

My understanding the phrase is to cover “the unnamed and unseen public government employees that saves the state from collapsing.”

voice of the damned wrote:

Except that as originally used by a certain type of left-winger, it seemed to mean anything the state does in secret, especially if it somehow involves subterfuge or crime. As such, it's been used to include things like the Bay Of Pigs, even though that wasn't preventing the American state from collapsing. (It failed, but the state is still there.)

The past few days, I've seen it used in a more complimentary sense, but with the meaning that you ascribe to it, something like "The permanent members of the bureaucracy who resist illegitmate pressure from interloping elected officials." Which I suppose might verge on subterfuge, though as I say, the intended meaning really does seem to be more positve. We're supposed to be glad that the CIA is refusing to share intel with Trump, for example.   

The place I remember seeing this complimentary usage was Slate.com, whose writers sometimes tend toward the slapdash. So they might not have been aware of its previous negative connotations.

Slate writers (or anyone else) deciding to fight for ownership of the "deep state" meme would be a very positive development, I think.  As opposed to just ceding ownership of "deep state" to the right.


quizzical
Offline
Joined: Dec 8 2011

we have anonymous siding with Trump and the righteous Flynn. huh.


voice of the damned
Offline
Joined: Sep 23 2004

quizzical wrote:

we have anonymous siding with Trump and the righteous Flynn. huh.

The writer talks about "globalists" being behind the supposed coup. Whatever the laudable usage that term has occassionally found on the left, it seems a little tainted to me, via its currency among the isolationist Right, monetary-reformers etc. I'm wondering what the particular slant of that Anonymous group is. My understanding is that they are not a centralized orgnaization with one coherent party line.


bekayne
Offline
Joined: Jan 23 2006

voice of the damned wrote:

quizzical wrote:

we have anonymous siding with Trump and the righteous Flynn. huh.

The writer talks about "globalists" being behind the supposed coup. Whatever the laudable usage that term has occassionally found on the left, it seems a little tainted to me, via its currency among the isolationist Right, monetary-reformers etc. I'm wondering what the particular slant of that Anonymous group is. My understanding is that they are not a centralized orgnaization with one coherent party line.

They spell it (((globalists)))


josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002

josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002
Michael Moriarity
Offline
Joined: Jul 27 2001

bekayne wrote:

They spell it (((globalists)))

For any here who haven't heard of it, the triple parentheses is a signal used by the alt-right to indicate a Jew.


Mr. Magoo
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2002

bekayne
Offline
Joined: Jan 23 2006

Mr. Magoo wrote:

Seems complicated.  Even Adbusters went with a very recognizable yellow star.

A sheriff's star! 


Webgear
Offline
Joined: May 30 2005

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/five-eyes-network-threat-1.3986265?cmp=rss

"Canadian intelligence agencies could end up feeling the pain of the bruising political fight unfolding in Washington over leaks and the alleged ties of some in the Trump administration to Russia, experts warned on Thursday."


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments