babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Gentrification in Metro Vancouver
May 18, 2016 - 1:55am
Are low-income people being pushed out of Metrotown?
Activists call for Burnaby to save older apartment buildings from demolition
City will give demoviction report ‘serious consideration’
Here's what my friend Murray Martin wrote when he posted the article on Facebook:
lol i thought Burnaby's governance was soooooooo left and wonderful!!!!
If you look at Burnaby city council, it is an old boys club. These guys have done a lot of good things over the years, but have lost touch in some ways. When they were young, a working class family could buy a home in Burnaby with a nice yard. In Metro Vancouver, back then especially, anyone who rents is seen as a lesser citizen. Maybe even of questionable character.
The most cynical part of me wonders if the renters are being ignored because Burnaby council figures they'll move out to Surrey or beyond, so don't matter politically.
The BCA has spent the last 25 years densifying Burnaby as part of a green strategy. Around all the Sky Train stations they have promoted highrise development. The housing issue runs into their green agenda. They are anti-pipeline and pro-parks and pro-density around mass transit sites. It is hard to see how they will proceed given that those issues have been their bread and butter for a long time. They win elections based on providing great community services and more parkland than any place else in Canada while being right in the middle of the 17 municipalities in Metro Vancouver when it comes to taxes.
Rightly or wrongly they have taken the view that as a municipality they will work with senior levels of government on issues like homelessness and affordability housing but they will not carry the ball alone in matters that they do not have the fiscal capability to deal with themselves. It is one of the areas that they are not very progressive about but instead are hard line pragmatists.
The BCA often cites a historic side to it. During the depression years the Burnaby counsel went bankrupt providing basic services to the people affected by losing their jobs. The provincial government that should have been paying for those social services imposed a trusteeship on the city in response to the bankruptcy. That Trustee took the main beach area at the foot of Willingdon and sold it at fore sale prices to the oil and gas industry. That is why the Chevron refinery sits on land that used to be the cities main beach playground for citizens.
A few years ago they opened this new facility in one of the poorest areas of the city. So they are way better than most of Metro Vancouver but not perfect.
http://www.burnabynow.com/news/edmonds-from-no-pool-at-all-to-the-best-i...
A Community Under Attack (PDF)
Check this piece of tripe put out by the CBC:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vacancy-rate-rentals-buil...
Money exchanged hands for this. No shame at all.
Burnaby has a development plan going back to the mid-1960's that restricts high density development to one of four "town centres" Metrotown is one of these. Though the plans have been updated over the years, high density development has remained restricted to one of the four town centres. The one exception is the planned community that was built a few years ago next to SFU on Burnaby Mountain. Burnaby has also allowed medium density development (3-5 stories) on select arterial streets outside of the four town centres.
The southern portion of Metrotown (south of the Skytrain) is a low-income community of two and three story walkup apartments that were built from the late 1950s through early 1980s. This is the community that is under attack by gentrification. Several high rises are already constructed or under construction along the south side of Beresford, the street which runs next to the Skytrain on the south side.
Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan has said in interviews that Burnaby has a responsibility to densify in order to help provide for the increase in Metro Vancouver's population. He claims that this trumps concern for those who are displaced from rental apartments that are torn down as part of this process.
The Burnaby Citzens Association Council (The BCA is an NDP farm team; while it is not affiliated with the NDP, it's members are required to be members of the NDP) has chosen not to densify neighbourhoods of single family houses and duplexes, and the four town centres development policy is a large part of this.
The problem is that instead of the gentle densification that Jane Jacobs championed in the 1960s and 1970s, Burnaby is allowing rampant gentrification in its town centres, while allowing other neighbourhoods to remain low-density.
Everything you say is basically true. However I lived in Burnaby for 20 years and I still think it is by far the best city in Metro Vancouver. I often tried to push the counsel on issues especially the lack of a homeless strategy. With the BCA you get both good and bad. The BCA is a centre left municipal party that has never tried to be a completely left wing party but it delivers first rate city services with union employees and has attained a high quality of life with great community centres and parks everywhere. I have also seen the people who have run against them over the years and if any of them had been elected instead the city would be a lot worse off, especially for poor people. Its oppostion has always had the right wing mantra of paying less for services by privatizing them.
I hope they rethink this particular issue and try to develop a better strategy. Having said that it is tied into the newest plan to create a "downtown" area at Metrotown so we shall see how that goes. The fact is that the area has been constantly changing for 40 years and will not now remain static without any redevelopment so the real question is how does one build affordable new rental housing in BC. That is something that so far no municiality in the province has figured out.
http://www.bcbusiness.ca/real-estate/burnaby-seeks-to-make-a-downtown-ou...
i'd rank New Westminster up there as the other 'best' city in Metro Vancouver. Burnaby is better on some things than New West, and New West is better on some things that Burnaby. Though because New West is so much smaler in size and population than Burnaby, it's a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
Agree with everything you've said here. Though this doesn't in my opinion let the BCA off the hook for wanting to let 2-3 story affordable walkup rental apartment buildings get torn down and replace by luxury condos. Though I don't place all of the blame on the City of Burnaby, since the real solution in Metrotown would be to replace the 2-3 story walkups with 5-7 story co-ops, but this would require provincial and/or federal money.
Now, when it comes to the lack of a homeless shelter in Burnaby, I do hold the BCA responsible for this sorry state of affairs. And while I agree with Derek Corrigan that homeless shelters are not a solution, I also believe they are a 'necessary' stop-gap measure that municipalities need to take advantage of in the absence of any more permanent solutions being on offer from the province and the feds.
LETTERS: How can Burnaby be so 'heartless'?
Here is the article in the G & M she is talking about. Many people when following Metro Vancouver politics do not understand they have a rather unique city Charter while the other municipalities are governed by the a different statute.
The other reality is one that is in the G & M article and that is that cities have never been the builders of social housing.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/burnaby-bc-resident...
I was aware of this, but not of the differences between the Vancouver Charter and the law that governs other municipalities in BC. I'm still not.
I agree with Colleen Jordan about the tough position that municipalities are in with the province and feds not providing social housing, and the province not allowing municipalities to zone for rentals.
That won't stop me from posting articles critical of the BCA on this issue, even if that criticism is at least partially misdirected. This is a thread about gentrification in Burnaby, after all.
Indeed and when I lived in Burnaby it didn't stop me from lobbying the counsel on the issues. In the past I knew all of them personally and they got a little tired of my pushing housing and homeless issues. The question I always ask myself is if the BCA is defeated will the people who replace them care more about those issues and frankly I don't see any group in Burnaby that is going to beat the BCA by campaigning from the left.
so Van isn't part of the Community Charter governing other cities and towns?
No it is under the its own regime.
http://vancouver.ca/your-government/the-vancouver-charter.aspx
NDP Housing critic David Eby calls demovictions "an absolutely heartbreaking situation"
http://www.cknw.com/2016/06/06/housing-critic-says-demovictions-show-bur...
Here is a good article on what is happening in Vancouver to a rental neighbourhood.
http://www.vancourier.com/news/grandview-woodland-residents-fear-renovic...
I'm not impressed with the NIMBY behaviour of some homeowners near Commercial Drive. This isn't another glass condo owner. It is mid-rise rental housing that is badly needed right now.
http://www.straight.com/news/726261/housing-unaffordability-and-neighbou...
You do realize that this article is not about Burnaby don't you?
I noticed you posted about East Van in this thread, so I figured why start a new thread.
While I agree that more rental accomodation is needed in Vancouver, I'm not a fan of the proposed development at Commercial and Venables.
For starters, I don't believe that the rental units in this development qualify as "affordable", and therefore will not stop the displacement of lower income people in Vancouver.
More importantly, this building is intended to be precedent setting for Commercial Drive, as the plan is to eventually replace most of the existing buildings on the drive with mid-rise residential buildings with ground floor commercial space. This process will likely displace most of the existing residents in those buildings along the drive that include residential, as new residential units will likely have a higher rent than current units. And the commercial rents will likely skyrocket as well, displacing many if not most of Commercial Drive's beloved businesses.
Top this off with the fact that if current building design trends hold, the redevelopment of Commercial Drive will replace the current eclectic mix of building going back many decades, with a relatively uniform set of glass and steel buildings.
All of which will transform Commercial Drive from one of the most vibrant public spaces in Canada, to another relatively generic and soulless gentrified Vancouver street.
I've pm'd the mods to request a change in the title of this thread to Gentrification in Metro Vancouver, as this would better reflect the contents of the thread.
I just want to point out that the proposed development at Commercial and Venables wasn't the one I was refering to. Commercial and Venables would be 12 stories whereas the project at Commercial and 18th St, in the artlcle I referenced, is no more than 6 stories. The site where the Commercial and 18th St. development would take place is currently four houses (with no real heritage value imo) on overgrown, badly maintained, lots a few blocks south of Commercial and Broadway.
I understand the concern over the 12 story proposal at Commercial and Venables and how that will impact The Drive. Although, at the same time, there are several non-profit housing organizations who really want this to go ahead. I'm more torn on this one.
Great idea now all the articles can focus on Vancouver since that is the only part of the Lower Mainland that exists in the MSM.
By the time I requested the thread title change, the current discussion was about gentrification in the Commercial Drive area. The current thread title better reflects the scope of the discussion in the thread, and in no way precludes further article postings and discussion on the situation in Burnaby.
Demoviction protesters occupy Burnaby apartment
Burnaby apartment occupiers holding firm, willing to risk arrest
Development sites occupied to protest high Metro Vancouver housing costs