babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Syndicate
Support rabble | Advertise with us | Contact our staff | About rabble | Log-in or Register for a new account | Corrections | Privacy policy | Comment policy | Newsfeeds | Mailing lists
rabble: Features | Columnists | In Cahoots | Blogs | Books | Photos | What's Up | Polls
babble: Forum Topics | Active Topics
The rpn: About the RPN | Become a podcaster
rabbleTV: Program Guide | Features | Indie Inside | Best of the net
Copyright © 2001- the authors
More to the point, doesn't the law require "misogyny" to contain at least 10% real misogyny in order to be labelled misogyny? Like "fruit juice" versus "fruit beverage"?
I don't see anything here that's directed at her sex or gender, just her stupid.
Plus, she totally hallucinated an entire Bowling Green Massacre and then chose to talk about it like it was a real thing. That sounds like both "stupid" and "can't shut up" to me.