babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
NB NDP Leader Resigns Amid Unhappiness With Fed Party Position On Syria
January 1, 2017 - 3:57pm
===
Portion of Dominic Cardy statement
The NDP is a one-stop shop. When you join the provincial NDP you join the federal NDP, whether you like it or not. Recently the federal NDP abandoned its proud history of internationalism, declaring itself a pacifist party. In a world where liberal democratic values are under threat from religious and political extremism and Canada confronts challenges from aggressive authoritarian regimes pacifism is a dangerous extreme, and immoral position. The federal NDP's statement that the conflict in Syria is "not our fight" goes against everything I believe: we live on a small planet with a responsibility to look after each other.
https://twitter.com/NickMooreCTV/status/815609977591177216
Not all the comments where favourable.
"Good riddance to a chauvinist and Al-Qaeda apologist. I'm glad the #NDP opposed the jingoistic march to western imperialism. @NickMooreCTV"
I do not know specifically what NDP statement he objected to said. I also am not sure what kind of intervention he was thinking about. Was he calling for Canada to enter the fray on behalf of the people of Syria and join the Russians and Iranians in supporting the sovereign government?
From October last year
New Brunswick NDP leader’s proposal for a bigger Canadian role in Syria reflects a division running through the party over how to achieve peace
http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/new-brunswick-ndp-leader-argues-f...
R2P or Responsibility to Protect is a imperial doctrine used to justify war, attacking sovereign countries, clubbing the UN into submission, and so on. It's about as internationalist as a firing squad.
This reads more like a noisy demand for the NDP to shift more to the right. Maybe GoC employees in that part of the country include the DND, etc., and there's more support for R2P and related justifications for militarism.
I'm sorry.
I guess since the federal NDP voted in favour of that very process for Libya one should look at the results to gauge the overall effect of the policy. Libya is in chaos and the people are at the mercy of roving gangs of armed militias while none of the Western NGO's have been able to kickstart anything that even vaguely resembles a democracy.. What did the people of Syria ever do to us for anyone to wish the same fate on them?
Here is a USIP assessment.
http://www.usip.org/publications/the-current-situation-in-libya
Just looks like attention seeking on Dominic's part. Bye.
As someone who's never been to New Brunswick and is looking at this from Québec -- wow, how far to the right is Dominic Cardy? That little screed looks like it could've been written by Mike Harris.
I'm disappointed to hear about Cardy's resignation but I am not surprised. I have seen the interference he cites in this message first-hand in New Brunswick.
And the fact that under Mr. Cardy's exemplary leadership the NBNDP remains seatless and in FOURTH place in the polls has nothing to do with his "principled" decision to resign, of course.
Which federal NB riding will Justin hand him a Liberal nomination for 2020 in, then?
In what I assume is an unintentionally brilliant nod to Orwell, Cardy has named his pro-bombing organization "Canadians for Peace in Syria".
Here's his full statement:
Thank you for posting that.
Cardy's statement contains a clear and blatant lie. The NDP did NOT "declare itself a pacifist party". It opposed the idea of bombing Syria. The party did not say it opposes the use of force in any and all situations that might ever occur for the rest of eternity.
A person or a party doesn't HAVE to support bombing Syria just to prove that person or that party is not unalterably opposed to war in any form.
It's pretty obvious what's going on here:
Cardy has been an utter failure as leader of the NBNDP. Despite the fact that the hardline Blairite policies he imposed on the party were supposed to be a guarantee of a massive increase in popular support, the NBNDP is currently LESS popular than it was at the last provincial election or at the 2015 federal election. His opponents in the NBNDP(most of who he sees as ultraleft throwbacks) had been pushing for another leadership review. So Cardy realized he had to go...but not without getting payback against the NBNDP left(and perhaps even Mulcair himself as he millimetres towards the door) by smearing the party as a bunch of gutless peaceniks. By doing this, he would not only make it harder for anyone who succeeded him in the provincial leadership to outperform him at the next NB election, he would also give aid and comfort to the other major federal parties(either of which, given Cardy's complete absence of personal political conviction, could offer him a federal nomination and the chance to be the Hazen Argue of the Maritimes).
It's about vengeance and having what the Brits call "an eye for the main chance".
The difference is Hazen Argue could get himself elected. Why would the other parties bother with Cardy? The federal Liberals will have no or very few vacancies, and the Conservatives will need candidates with personal popularity.
There's that. Justin could stick him in the Senate as a reward for smearing the Dippers.
And once Hazen switched parties, HE only got elected once. They put him in the Senate for helping hold the NDP vote down in the Prairies in the 1962-65 era.
Dominic Cardy gives an interview to CTV Atlantic his reasons for not only quitting as party leader, but from the NDP Party
http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-b-ndp-leader-resigns-over-infighting-and-cl...
Cardy says he doesn't have a warm relationship with NB Liberals, says GRN and PANB have similar fringe/extremists as the NDP.
The only person he is non-critical about is PC Leader Blaine Higgs
https://twitter.com/NickMooreCTV/status/815937989243240448
I'm sure he'd have a better time with the provincial PCs. I can see why he's done with the NBNDP. This still doesn't explain his weird, and not really explained, position on the federal NDP and Syria.
Took a swipe at labour on the way out too I see.
I agree regarding Syria. Regarding "pacifism", it is a term that Mulcair would sometimes use. See link from Sept 2015 and link from Sept 2016. I assume this was 1.) because it aligns with Mulcair's views, and 2.) is seen as a strategic stance for winning votes in Quebec. For the most part, I feel the NDP has promoted peace and human rights and has seen war as a last resort. A relatively new policy is the following:
The policy seems a step in the right direction. So, it's clear where the NDP would stand on missions that are solely American initiatives without a UN mandate.
Being less shy about using terms like "pacifist" and "socialist" seems to be part of the new branding of the NDP. I myself don't get too obsessive about words. Others unfortunately do, though. It's like all the stupid banter I often see from ignoramuses about whether the NDP is "social democratic" or "democratic socialist". Lefties looking to infight. To me, being pro-peace as much as possible and using war as a last resort is being (or at least leaning toward being) pacifist. It's not a word I get bent outta shape over. Others who are dying to infight, of course, do.
I think the military is a big employer in the Atlantic provinces. So, words like "pacifist" tend not to go over well there.
That said, I think Cardy is taking a rather cowardly way out from his own failure by tossing darts at everyone while he leaves.
I dwelt on the assertion about the NDP being "a pacifist party" because in making that claim, Cardy has given the Liberals and the Conservatives a devastating attack line to use against the NDP at the next federal election.
To a lot of voters, the claim that a party is "pacifist" automatically delegitimizes that party. It shouldn't(there's no reason Canada couldn't have a government that rejected war other than the defense of Canadian soil from external attack), but it does.
War as-an-extreme-last-resort needs to be kept in the policy offer...but this can still include a recognition that war is pretty much always a tragedy and a failure and nothing whose outcome should ever again be celebrated by anyone.
I see no evidence of the NDP as a 'pacifist' party. On the contrary, it's bellicose boostering of imperialism in Libya, Ukraine and Syria, (esp sanctions, White Helmets etc) frequently exceeds that of the government itself. NDP = No Difference Party.
Cardy won't rule out return to politics, jump to PCs:
Pardon my skepticism, but I don't think Mr. Cardy actually gives a shit about the people of Syria.
The largest public sector union in NB is undoubtedly CUPE, right? So does anyone closer to the scene know what those contradictions are about?
He's a fracking waste of skin who rightly belongs in the PC party. I found this gem from just after the 2014 election. The subtext might explain his rant about public sector unions. Union activists in the NDP don't mind nomination battles.
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/world/canada/pro-gas-fracking-governmen...