babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Missing in media: women's voices
October 7, 2008 - 4:37am
Ms Communicate responds.
Oh, I notice this all the time. Take any news story, whether it is about seniors, or children or anything and everything in between, if it is a mixed group, the story will show interviews with an uneven # of people 3 or 5, and without exception, the majority of the voices heard will be male. 2 out of 3, or 3 out of 5, it does not change. Now take a look at any television show that isn't obviously a woman's show, and you will see the same sort of breakdown. A show about doctors, lawyers or criminal investigation will have an uneven number of characters, and the overwhelming majority of them will be male. Most girls learn to keep their mouths shut about what it important to them because, clearly, no one cares to hear from them.
And, more on topic, I am always deeply offended when it is assumed that the concerns of children are necessarily or obviously my concerns. I have no children, and aren't going to have any. I like them just fine, but there is more to my personal concerns and issues than children. Also, being lumped together with them in a "women & children" sort of way is offensive, as the inference is that women need to be taken care of in some way.
The link to Ms. Communicate didn't work so I don't know what the response to this was but here's mine.
Oooh, the "women and children" thing drives me nuts too, fortunate. I've always hated it when news reports lump "women and children" together, usually when talking about civilian deaths.
Women are not children. Women are not equivalent to children! Gah!