babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Captive Canada - From Frying Pan to Prairie Fire: One Captivation after Another

Richard Sanders
Offline
Joined: Jul 27 2001

A century and more ago, many Ukrainians were captivated by the hype of ads churned out by Canada’s government and profit-seeking shipping firms.  Enticed to leave the political and economic confines of their homeland, many had their dreams of freedom dashed on the Canadian prairies.  As historian Orest Martynowych has noted, Ukrainians were “economically exploited, socially oppressed, culturally neglected, colonized people, preyed upon by foreign landowners, bureaucrats and merchants, and frequently patronized and humiliated by...privileged members of their own nationality.”  After fleeing this tyranny, many of these radicalised newcomers were thrown into new struggles for freedom, and thousands were thrown straight into Canadian slave labour camps.

This short article is a sidebar to War Mania, Mass Hysteria and Moral Panics: Rendered Captive by Barbed Wire and Maple Leaves.  It appears in

Captive Canada:  
Renditions of the Peaceable Kingdom at War,

from Narratives of WWI and the Red Scare to the Mass Internment of Civilians
Issue #68 of Press for Conversion (Spring 2016), pp.14.

Published by the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade (COAT).  If you quote this article, please cite the source above.  And, please consider subscribing, ordering a copy &/or donating. Thanks.   Here is the pdf version of the article below.

From Frying Pan to Prairie Fire: 
One Captivation after Another

By Richard Sanders, Coordinator, Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade (COAT)

Captivated by the hype of ads churned out by Canada’s government and profit-seeking shipping firms, many Ukrainians left the political and economic confines of their homeland, only to have their dreams of freedom dashed on the prairies.  As historian Orest Martynowych noted, Ukrainians were

“economically exploited, socially oppressed, culturally neglected, colonized people, preyed upon by foreign landowners, bureaucrats and merchants, and frequently patronized and humiliated by...privileged members of their own nationality.”1

But, “for many of these Ukrainian peasants, immigration to Canada did not prove to be a liberating experience.”  In fact, “isolated from modern sectors of Canadian society and left without basic social services,” said Martynowych, “life continued to be no less hazardous and insecure than...in the Old World.”2

Likewise, Canada’s political system was anything but liberating. As Ukrainian researcher Wasyl Swystun wrote in J.S.Woodsworth’s government report, Ukrainian Rural Communities (1917): “Ukrainians in Canada...are disgusted with the political corruption, which is worse than anything they have known in the Old Country,” and “see no great difference between platforms of the two parties [Liberal and Conservative].”3 

Robert Lorne Richardson, MPIn December 1917, a former Manitoba Liberal MP, Robert L.Richardson—while campaigning for the Conservative’s Unionist Party—called for the outright enslavement of “enemy aliens.” “[W]e won’t need many guards,” he said. “It will be easy enough when a few foreigners are shot; the others will work eagerly.”4  Ukrainian socialists replied to this by writing that the

“Ukrainian immigrant did not flee from the Kaiser’s knout [whip] in order to fall under another knout in Canada. He refuses to tolerate Kaiserism regardless of who tries to impose it.”

In postCzarist Ukraine, they asserted, “liberty and democracy are held in higher esteem than here in Canada.”5

Despite, or likely aided by, his hyped-up xenophobia, Richardson—the novelist, journalist and owner/editor of the Winnipeg Tribune—was easily re-elected to Parliament in 1917.  Like “many other businessmen,” he was “swept up in the hysteria of the ‘Red Scare.’” In 1919, Richardson warned Prime Minister Borden that a “‘Bolshevik’ uprising” was brewing in Manitoba. Later, his newspaper’s hate-filled, phobic rants blamed Winnipeg’s 1919 General Strike on violent “reds” and “irresponsible, lawless, anarchistic agitators”6 who were riling up Canada’s “undesirable” east Europeans.

After fleeing the tyrannies of eastern Europe, many radicalised newcomers to Canada were thrown headlong into challenging new struggles for freedom, and—in thousands of cases—they were thrown straight into Canada’s slave labour camps.

References

1. Orest Martynowych, Village radicals and peasant immigrants: The social roots of factionalism among Ukrainian immigrants in Canada, 1896-1918, 1978, p.3.  (MA thesis, Graduate Studies, Manitoba.)
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/MQ36804.pdf
 

2. Ibid., p.286.

3. Wasyl Swystun, “Political Organization & Activities,” in J.S.Woodsworth, Ukrainian Rural Communities, January 25, 1917, p.117-118. J.S.Woodsworth fonds: H-2278, Vol.11 #38
http://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_h2278/175?r=0&s=4
 

4. Robotchyi Narod, December 12, 1917, cited by Martynowych, Op. cit., p.261.

5. Ibid.

6. M.G.Dupuis, The Response of the Toronto Daily Press to the Winnipeg General Strike, 1973. (MA thesis, History, Ottawa)
http://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/22600/1/EC55684.PDF


Comments

kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

What happened to the Ukrainian immigrants was outrageous but not as bad as what we did to the Doukhobors 40 years later when we didn't even have a war to blame for the internment of innocent people, let alone children.

 


Richard Sanders
Offline
Joined: Jul 27 2001

Peter KroptkinThanks for that comment on the internment of Doukhobours.  That is yet another shameful example of the Canadian state's use of mass captivity to exert social control over unruly civilians who were deemed a threat.

I have not yet researched how "progressives" reacted to this harsh abuse of civil liberties.   Was there much protest from mainstream progressives?  I suspect there was not.  I suspect that many progressives turned a blind eye to the rounding up of these Doukhobors and their children.  Are my suspicions correct?  If so, how was this justified and rationalised by progressives?  What were the humanitarian-sounding narratives that captured well-meaning people's imagination and allowed them to not only accept this state crime, but to get them to help carry it out?  Understanding this process will help us deal with present-day cases of complicity in state crimes by progressive activists, groups and parties.

Your namesake, Peter Kropotkin, figures in another article in Captive Canada called "The Russian Revolution of 1905-1907." This article mentions Kropotkin's tour of Canada in 1897 and his efforts (along with Leon Tolstoy) to get Canada to allow Doukhobors to immigrate to Canada after they had burned all their guns and refused conscription. 

The Liberal government was even more draconian in its use of the War Measures Act (WMA) in WWII than the Conservatives had been when they created the Act in WWI (with unanimous Liberal support in the House, of course.  And the lone Labour MP also supported the passing of the WMA, making it unanimous.) 

Doukhobors were among the pacifists who were rounded up and held captive in internment camps during WWII.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments