babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

For B, various articles and blogs regarding pro sex work by sex workers

fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

This is for Brach, and everyone really.   When faced with those one occasional blog or article used to 'prove' that all sex workers hate their work, blah blah, here I will take the (very long) time to post links to various articles and bloggers.    

 

Gaye Dalton, this is the twitter account, but within it she will include links to her blog, varioius articles, other bloggers etc.  Primarily she works  on uncovering fraudsters in the various socalled Rescue industry.

https://twitter.com/mechanima

 

Olive Seraphim, former sex trafficking survivor wants you to know that she fully supports decriminalization.      http://oliveseraphim.wordpress.com/2014/05/17/former-sex-workers-have-no-place-in-the-criminalization-debate/

 

 


Comments

fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Actually, also getting some twitter accounts here.   many posts lead to more info.  

 

http://mymythbuster.wordpress.com/myth-turn-off-the-red-light-are-trying...

 

More Rescue Industry fraud:  http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2014/06/04/chong-kim-the-woman-whose-allegedly-true-story-served-as-the-basis-for-megan-griffiths-film-eden-revealed-to-be-a-fraud

 

maggie mcneil   https://twitter.com/Maggie_McNeill

 

Christina Parreira, https://twitter.com/SinCityGrrrl  

Who writes, what it is REALLY like to work at the Nevada brothel here:    http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/guest-columnist-christina-parreira/

 

Dr. Brooke Magnanti  http://sexonomics-uk.blogspot.ca

http://thebaffler.com/blog/2014/06/zombie_statistics_on_sex_work

When the statistics about the sex work industry are wrong, it matters. For the organizations that rely on people believing the sex industry is enormous to secure funding, the inflation of these numbers is a win. But for the sex workers themselves, who may face more intrusive police and tax investigations fueled by unrealistic depictions of the industry, however, the failure of ONS to correct their heavily flawed model is a disaster.

 

http://www.feminisnt.com/     I'm an atheist who was a full-time pornographer and sex worker for 10 years, but I'm now transitioning out of the jizz biz into an awesome science career. In my silly younger days, I was a "sex-positive feminist," but I grew up and stopped trying to shoehorn myself into a useless ideology like a pair of ill-fitting high heels. I oppose the core feminist beliefs that women are inherently feeble victims, brainwashed by "the patriarchy," and that we can't succeed in life unless we're treated like babies. I operate SWAAY.org, the only sex workers' rights project aimed solely at public outreach and education. 

 

http://harlotsparlour.com/    The Sex Industry Blog

 

http://www.texasgoldengirl.com/afterhours/sex-working-cliche/

 

https://twitter.com/Marijke_Vonk    Psychologist | Activist | Sex Positive    The Netherlands

 

The myth of trafficking:   http://www.timeslive.co.za/africa/2011/01/01/chinese-prostitutes-resist-effort-to-rescue-them-from-africa

They found 11 Chinese women who had been promised decent jobs in Paris by traffickers but ended up working in a Chinese-owned karaoke bar in the country's capital Kinshasa, the newspaper said.

After a joint raid by Chinese and Congolese police on the karaoke bar, however, the women decided to stay in the country, saying it was easier to make good money there than in China.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

More accusations against Somaly Mam, already revealed as a fraud, forcibly confining in the name of 'rescue' :   http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/06/how-bad-sex-trafficking-cambodia-201468124236117557.html

In 2011, Mam told an interviewer that there were 80,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in Cambodia, 58 percent of whom were trafficked. In a 2010 Somaly Mam Foundation video, Hollywood actress Lucy Liu solemnly intoned in a voiceover that "the low-end estimate for the number of sex slaves in Cambodia alone is over 40,000". Mam has also claimed that it is commonplace for children as young as 3 to be sold into sex slavery in Cambodia.

The source for these numbers is unclear, and according to some, wrong.

study published in 2011 by the UN Inter-Agency Project on Trafficking based on data collected in 2008 stated that the number of sex trafficking victims in Cambodia is 1,058 at most, including 127 children, six of whom were under the age of 13. The majority of these cases involved women who had fallen into debt to their brothels, or prostitutes under the age of 18. These are both abhorrent and illegal, but they are a far cry from the extreme scenarios Mam often invoked - girls put in cages, tortured with electricity, having their eyes gouged out by pimps.

"We never encountered any such thing, and we certainly looked for it," the study's author, Thomas Steinfatt, said this week. "We couldn't find any instances of that ... In terms of people tortured, I think they've been watching too many movies."

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/columnists/dont-piano-teache...

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/a-chance-to-lead-the-world-c...

 

http://www.cliterati.co.uk/2014/06/many-will-take/

According to the popular narrative, sex workers are “bad” or “defective” or otherwise abnormal; we are not to be trusted even to run our own lives, so when “good” women who claim to want what’s best for us say that we need to be criminalized for our own good – that our statements she be ignored, our clients demonized, our workplaces raided by armed thugs who drag us away to cages where we can be subjected to degrading attempts to “correct” or brainwash us, and our organizations branded as a “pimp lobby” – the politicians side with them and the legions of the ignorant mindlessly parrot their drivel about “sex trafficking”. There are many of these righteous guardians of female purity; in Ireland, for example, they are led by Ruhama, an organization founded by the exact same nuns who ran the infamous Magdalene laundries, where sex workers and other “sinful” women were condemned to slave labor until they were completely broken. Among these outcasts were unwed mothers, whose children were ripped from them and incarcerated in hell-holes like St. Mary’s Mother and Baby Home:

 

 

https://twitter.com/melissagira https://twitter.com/

 http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/03/14/right-body-project-rose-tries-save-sex-workers/

I Have a Right to My Own Body’: How Project ROSE Tries to ‘Save’ Sex Workers

 

https://twitter.com/GlasgaeLauraLee

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Rabble blogger Mercedes.     http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/mercedes-allen/2014/06/c-36-conflating-sex-work-human-trafficking

C-36: Conflating sex work with human trafficking

 using the term “human trafficking” interchangeably with sex work actually confuses the issue significantly, diverting funds and energy away from where it's needed and toward combating legitimate sex work as well.  This makes it impossible to get clear and realistically comparative data, and reallocates funding away from effective anti-trafficking initiatives.  It undermines the fight against trafficking and tarnishes the organizations that try to do the needed work, making it much harder to address actual human trafficking.  And it has allowed far right moralists who are more interested in controlling peoples’ sexual habits seductively hijack the dialogue that once considered womens' autonomy and choice to be important.

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/trust-me-this-prostitution-law-wont-help-hookers/article19113812/?cmpid=rss1

 

Christine Wilson is a former prostitute and a sociologist. This is not her real name.

I am a former hooker, and the first thing that I want you to know is that I would not encourage anyone to enter the sex trade. The second thing I want to say is that Canada’s proposed new prostitution laws couldn’t be more of a disaster.

I’ve heard the triumphant rhetoric from some feminist types who claim the new laws are a glorious victory for women’s rights. Wrong. It is the biggest set back we could have possibly faced.

What the government wants you to believe is that women in the sex trade will now be treated like the victims that they are and the johns will be viewed as the predatory perverts they have always been. That is what Justice Minister Peter Mackay wants you to believe. The reality is very different.

The fact of the matter is regardless of what Mr. MacKay may say; he has effectively condemned his “victims” to a life of working on the streets. Provisions in the legislation that will ban both print and on-line advertising mean that sex trade workers will no longer be able to work from home or in what are known as bawdy houses.

If you can’t advertise, that means you can’t bring the customers to you. You can’t pre-screen your clients and you can’t have a driver or body guard because it will also be illegal for a third party to profit from someone else’s prostitution. That leaves one option - alone on the streets. There simply will be no other way to do it.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Currently showing comments from the politicians

https://twitter.com/AfterBedford

 

Boivin: 'we don't know how scientific the Public Consult was. Any scientific info has not been revealed'

Boivin: 'I want to see just 1 opinion on how the various clauses are actually in compliance w the SCC ruling.'

Boivin on '1 major prob of #C36, cl 15: criminalizing the 'victims we want to protect'.

 

PC MP Blaney & Smith only talk of those who are exploited. Ignoring all those who aren't.

Casey to Smith: 'would you not agree there were better options in the middle to address the issue of safety?', #

Boivin to Smith: 'how can she SERIOUSLY think only $20million will help those in need

Smith now citing a study that says there is a rise in underage prostitution in New Zealand. There is *no* evidence of that being true.

. @MPJoySmith now mocking journalists & their reaction to #C36. Considering PCs have MPS who DON'T know laws, journalists can help.

Casey: 'the decision to double down on criminal sanctions on complex social problems" is what's wrong w this gov'.

Casey reading a note from a sexworker, Rachel, about how #C36 affects her.   Rachel outlining how her current work/legal screening ensures her safety. #C36 "is a gift to sexual predators posing as clients"

Casey: 'MacKay won't release any Charter compliant docs, nor the $175K study on #C36. Why?'

MP Easter wants more time allocation for proper discussion on #C36. Wants gov to provide who gave the legal advice in drafting.

 

 



fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

https://twitter.com/hashtag/C36?src=hash

Smith just said that we need to arrest Johns because they might start trying to solicit any pretty women they meet. yes. really.

Casey: 'diffs btwn Russian approach & so-called Made In Cda are relatively minor' 'Why shld we be like a country w human rights issues?

 

 

Something i found in a comment in the link above: swerfs and terfs, so i had to look it up and found this:  http://everydaywhorephobia.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/swerfsterfs-the-westboro-baptist-church-of-feminism/

Swerf = sex work exclusionary radical feminist

Terf =trans* exclusionary radical feminist.

They go hand in hand.

 

New article in the Georgia Straight      http://www.straight.com/news/663921/no-such-thing-typical-john-says-researcher

UVic's Chris Atchison knows because he's been studying them for about 20 years. The researcher also doesn't think that there is even such a thing as a "typical john".

"People who purchase sexual services come from all walks of life," Atchison told the Straight by phone. "They're male, they're female, they're couples, they're homosexuals, they're heterosexuals, they're bisexuals. They come from all racial and ethnic categories.

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

This is Canada wide, coming to a city near you http://www.straight.com/news/663926/sex-worker-protest-planned-response-bill-c-36

Same date in Hamiltion, Toronto, etc.  I don't have the info about where but a google should help you find info for your own city.  

I know several who will be going, and an equal number who would go but are afraid to be seen in public as a sex worker, due to the stigma and potential repercussions of what Bill C-36 might do to them if they were photographed.   

 

 

 


Captain Obvious
Offline
Joined: Apr 27 2005

fortunate wrote:

This is for Brach, and everyone really.   When faced with those one occasional blog or article used to 'prove' that all sex workers hate their work, blah blah, here I will take the (very long) time to post links to various articles and bloggers.    

I just wanted to say thanks for posting this. As you say, it is a bit tough to keep track of all the different arguments and POVs, and its helpful to have thing codified a bit.


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://rabble.ca/whatsup/national-day-action-sex-workers-and-allies-criminalization-costs-sex-worker-lives

National Day of Action by sex workers and allies: Criminalization costs sex worker lives

On Saturday, June 14, sex worker groups, along with organizations and individuals that support human rights and women's rights, are gathering across Canada to denounce the Conservative government's proposed bill (C36) to re-criminalize sex work. The new law criminalizes selling sex in public, purchasing sexual services, advertising sexual services and benefitting from the sale of sexual services.

In Toronto, Aboriginal Legal Services Toronto, Maggie's - Toronto Sex Workers' Action Project, COUNTERfit Women's Harm Reduction Program, Sex Professionals of Canada (SPOC), Bad Date Coalition (BDC), and the Feminist Coalition (a national coalition of 25 sexual assault centres, women’s shelters and other anti-violence agencies) are rallying together against this legislation.

"Maggie's is devastated by the proposed legislation. Sex workers will be forced into dangerous conditions, pushed into isolated areas and their ability to screen clients and work together will be criminalized,"according to Jean McDonald of Maggie’s - Toronto Sex Workers’ Action Project.

"Sex work is not inherently dangerous. However, the proposed law will lead to increased violence and exploitative conditions for the most marginalized sex workers: women who work on the street and who are disproportionately Aboriginal, transgendered, and/or in poverty. We will see more missing and murdered women as a result of this legislation."

Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto's Legal Director, Christa Big Canoe stated "Bill C-36 does not place the safety of sex workers as a primary objective, despite a preamble that says so. The proposed law is too similar to the old law, struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada, with new language. It proposes new forms of criminalization and raises risk that will likely hurt the most marginalized sex workers." She also said, "Raising the concerns of the most vulnerable and those impacted most by the proposed law is necessary so that decision makers understand the implications of passing this Bill."

According to Jane Doe, a well-known Toronto activist against sexual violence and coordinator of the Feminist Coalition for Full Decriminalization and the Human Rights and Labour Rights of Sex Workers (which applied to intervene in the Supreme Court Case): "The 'new' legislation put forward by the government will increase and even cause violence against sex workers - women who are our allies, colleagues, friends and family. An attack on that sector’s charter, human, and labour rights is an attack on all women.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

What are we talking about anyway, when we are discussing the SCC ruling, and say that new laws are not necessary?

The only laws overturned are very specific, and not all of them except for section 210 (all) ,  section 212 (1) (j)  and section 213 (1) (c)   according to https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/979787-ags-v-bedford-lebovitch-and-scott.html


These are the laws entirely, I have bolded only the parts the SCC eliminated, so you can see that the rest of the laws are still there, even after Dec 20, 2014 as far as I can tell, and I by no means have read the SCC ruling entirely or try to interpret it lol


Quote:
210. (1) Every one who keeps a common bawdy-house is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (Amended to 5 years, 2010)[24]
Landlord, inmate, etc.
(2) Every one who (a) is an inmate of a common bawdy-house, (b) is found, without lawful excuse, in a common bawdy-house, or (c) as owner, landlord, lessor, tenant, occupier, agent or otherwise having charge or control of any place, knowingly permits the place or any part thereof to be let or used for the purposes of a common bawdy-house, is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Notice of conviction to be served on owner
(3) Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (1), the court shall cause a notice of the conviction to be served on the owner, landlord or lessor of the place in respect of which the person is convicted or his agent, and the notice shall contain a statement to the effect that it is being served pursuant to this section.
Duty of landlord on notice
(4) Where a person on whom a notice is served under subsection (3) fails forthwith to exercise any right he may have to determine the tenancy or right of occupation of the person so convicted, and thereafter any person is convicted of an offence under subsection (1) in respect of the same premises, the person on whom the notice was served shall be deemed to have committed an offence under subsection (1) unless he proves that he has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the recurrence of the offence.


Transporting person to bawdy-house

211. Every one who knowingly takes, transports, directs, or offers to take, transport or direct, any other person to a common bawdy-house is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.


Procuring  212.

(1) Every one who(a) procures, attempts to procure or solicits a person to have illicit sexual intercourse with another person, whether in or out of Canada,(b) inveigles or entices a person who is not a prostitute to a common bawdy-house for the purpose of illicit sexual intercourse or prostitution,(c) knowingly conceals a person in a common bawdy-house,(d) procures or attempts to procure a person to become, whether in or out of Canada, a prostitute,(e) procures or attempts to procure a person to leave the usual place of abode of that person in Canada, if that place is not a common bawdy-house, with intent that the person may become an inmate or frequenter of a common bawdy-house, whether in or out of Canada,(f) on the arrival of a person in Canada, directs or causes that person to be directed or takes or causes that person to be taken, to a common bawdy-house,(g) procures a person to enter or leave Canada, for the purpose of prostitution,(h) for the purposes of gain, exercises control, direction or influence over the movements of a person in such manner as to show that he is aiding, abetting or compelling that person to engage in or carry on prostitution with any person or generally,(i) applies or administers to a person or causes that person to take any drug, intoxicating liquor, matter or thing with intent to stupefy or overpower that person in order thereby to enable any person to have illicit sexual intercourse with that person, or(j) lives wholly or in part on the avails of prostitution of another personin circumstances of exploitation (italicized phrase appended by the Ontario Court of Appeal - see notes above)is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.


Living on the avails of prostitution of person under eighteen
(2) Despite paragraph (1)(j), every person who lives wholly or in part on the avails of prostitution of another person who is under the age of eighteen years is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years.


Aggravated offence in relation to living on the avails of prostitution of a person under the age of eighteen years
(2.1) Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(j) and subsection (2), every person who lives wholly or in part on the avails of prostitution of another person under the age of eighteen years, and who (a) for the purposes of profit, aids, abets, counsels or compels the person under that age to engage in or carry on prostitution with any person or generally, and (b) uses, threatens to use or attempts to use violence, intimidation or coercion in relation to the person under that age, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years but not less than five years.


Presumption
(3) Evidence that a person lives with or is habitually in the company of a prostitute or lives in a common bawdy-house is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, proof that the person lives on the avails of prostitution, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(j) and subsections (2) and (2.1).


Offence — prostitution of person under eighteen
(4) Every person who, in any place, obtains for consideration, or communicates with anyone for the purpose of obtaining for consideration, the sexual services of a person who is under the age of eighteen years is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.


Offence in relation to prostitution

213. (1) Every person who in a public place or in any place open to public view (a) stops or attempts to stop any motor vehicle, (b) impedes the free flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic or ingress to or egress from premises adjacent to that place, or (c) stops or attempts to stop any person or in any manner communicates or attempts to communicate with any person for the purpose of engaging in prostitution or of obtaining the sexual services of a prostitute is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.


Definition of “public place”
(2) In this section, “public place” includes any place to which the public have access as of right or by invitation, express or implied, and any motor vehicle located in a public place or in any place open to public view.


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

https://www.facebook.com/sexworklawreform

An alliance between Canadian sex worker and allied groups, organizations and individuals fighting for reform of Canadian's prostitution laws.

The Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law reform is an alliance between Canadian sex worker and allied groups, organizations and individuals. We have joined forces across the country to ensure that sex workers' voices are central to discussions around law reform. Our mandate is to: fight against criminalization regimes and instead promote full decriminalization -- a made-in-Canada-New Zealand model. 

The Alliance is made up of the following groups and individuals:

Big Susie’s (Hamilton, ON)
BC Coalition and WCCSIP (Vancouver, BC)
Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network 
Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence (SWUAV) (Vancouver, BC)
Émilie Laliberté, Sex Worker Rights Activist (Montreal, QC)
FIRST (Vancouver, BC)
Kara Gillies, Community Organizer (Toronto, ON)
Maggie’s (Toronto, ON)
PIECE (Edmonton, AB)
Pivot Legal Society (Vancouver, BC)
POWER (Ottawa, ON)
Sex Workers Action Group (Kingston, ON) 
South Western Ontario Sex Workers (London, ON)
Sex Professionals of Canada (SPOC) (Toronto, ON)
Stop the Arrests! (Sault Ste Marie, ON)
Winnipeg Working Group (Winnipeg, MB)
Stella, l'amie de Maimie (Montreal, Quebec)
Stepping Stone (Halifax, NS)

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/bill-c-36-when-conservatives-and-feminists-collide/

 

We seem to have exchanged demonizing women for infantilizing them. (Perhaps someday we’ll discover some kind of crazy third alternative!) The new law concentrates on the demand for prostitution, rather than the supply, because “women are vulnerable” and the sex trade is never a choice—except possibly for some male prostitutes, although Conservative statements on the law always speak only of women and children. Somehow, this is exactly the opposite approach from the one our law takes to the war on drugs: In that case, the demand is considered relatively harmless and natural, while the suppliers can never be persecuted harshly enough. Why do you suppose this distinction is never noticed, much less accounted for?


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://www.afterbedford.com/#!language-matters/c7nn

Required reading if you want sex workers to listen to you.   :)

Excerpts from the link.

 

INTRODUCTION

The way we talk about sex work is anything but neutral – it communicates meaning and influences how people understand our work and create policy about us. The words we use when speaking about sex work – whether in media or legal arguments, with our friends or in discussion with a stranger – matter. Language used to describe sex work and sex workers varies across and within sex working communities – this speaks to differences in our histories, regional specificities and how we selfidentify.

 Sex work and sex workers are often framed in very simplistic and stereotypical ways that erase the complexity of our realities: good or bad, forced or chosen, glamorized or exploitative. When choosing language to talk about sex work we are trying to balance self-identification, our desire to represent our diversity and the importance of breaking through stereotypes and binary categories. When our choice of words differs from the beliefs and stereotypes that people have about us, people are quick to discredit us.

So, how and when we use language depends on who we are talking to. Within sex working communities we honour the language each of us uses to self-identify. We may, however, publicly reject or strategically choose other language to describe ourselves, because language can also divide and support public misconceptions of sex workers.

........

Prostitute, Sex Worker and Sex Professional

American sex worker and activist Carol Leigh coined the term sex work in the 1970s. While before this the term working girls was popular amongst workers, creation of the term sex work was a deliberate attempt to unite sex workers of all genders and sectors of work, and to highlight the work, or labour, that sex workers are doing. The term sex work is liberation from the deep-rooted negative and legalistic term prostitute.

 

Some of us call ourselves prostitutes, but recognize its negative connotations when outsiders use it. People use the word prostitute in different contexts: to refer to legislation where word prostitute is written into law; to refer to sex work that involves intercourse with clients; to refer to street prostitution; to refer to debasing oneself, not necessarily in a sexual context; and to refer to history when the word prostitute was used with pride. How and when we use these terms will differ depending on our audience.

 

Sex workers’ rejection of the term is often based in how the public perceives prostitutes and prostitution rather than an inherent shame in the word itself. Some sex workers also embrace the term sex professional. Like sex work, this term highlights and legitimizes the labour context of sex work. Other sex workers find this term alienating because the term professional can imply a level of accreditation that is not afforded to criminalized work. It can also insert a classist element to the work — some workers are seen as professional while others are not. Not all sex workers have access to the mechanisms that professionalize their work, and many work under precarious conditions.

 

Prostituted women

The gendered term prostituted women is sometimes used to refer to sex workers. This terms denies the agency of sex workers by suggesting that prostitution is something done to us. Many sex workers consider this framing and language around prostitution or sex work as disrespectful, alienating and invisibilizing of our realities.

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

10 Ways to Explain Prostitution Law Reform to Your Constituents

http://media.wix.com/ugd/177062_2674c9ead2f04b55b96a1883ae6d6267.pdf

1. If sex work isdecriminalized,will be there be laws in place that target harm and exploitation

Yes. Laws that directly target these harms will remain in place including those that prohibit physical assault, sexual assault, threatening, harassment, murder, extortion,human trafficking, and child exploitation.It is a common misperception that prostitution laws protect women from violence.  Since Canada’s prostitution laws make it difficult, if not impossible, for sex workers to work in safe and secure conditions, the repeal of these laws will substantially improve sex workers’ safety. Further, if sex workers are no longer treated like criminals, they will have greater access to the police and criminal justice system in the event that they experience violence.

 

......

4.  If we decriminalize sex work, will Canada become a haven for sex tourism and exploited/trafficked women?

Decriminalization of sex work does not mean increased trafficking in women. At present, women, girls, and men are trafficked into a wide variety of economic sectors including textile and agricultural work, domestic work, restaurant work, sweatshops,and the sex industry.

Criminalizing sex work has not, and will not stop trafficking.Instead, criminalization forces the sex industry underground, to less visible areas making it more difficult for victims of trafficking to come forward to access protectionfrom the state. As a result, trafficked sex workers end up in more vulnerable and disempowered circumstances.Decriminalization is an important aspect of anti-trafficking strategies because it creates a situation where sex workers are protected under the law, similar to other forms of employment, and traffickers will find it more difficult to function with impunity.

Sex workers themselves and their clients are best-placed to detect and report instances of trafficking or abuse, but criminalization prevents them from taking action. We have seen that in New Zealand there has been no increase in trafficking forprostitution. Indeed, New Zealand’s tier ranking is still the highest (most favourable)Tier 1 ranking in the US 2013 Trafficking In Persons (TIP) Report, and has been ever since New Zealand was included in the report in 2004


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Recap of the Swedish model    

 What Canada Can Learnfrom Sweden’s Laws that Criminalize the Purchase of Sexual Services

http://media.wix.com/ugd/177062_d7f02586cdcc4e43ad31628953d2b2d9.pdf

 

 

Canada vs Bedford: The Importance of the SCC Decision

http://media.wix.com/ugd/177062_4eb4319ffb254496a8b983516602b4a1.pdf

 

In 2007, three Ontario sex workers initiateda constitutional challenge to provisions of theCriminal Code that prohibit various aspects of adultprostitution, including:

• s. 210 (keeping or being found in a bawdy house),

• s. 212(1)(j) (living on the avails of prostitution), and

• s. 213(1)(c) (communicating in public for the purpose of prostitution).

The case of Attorney General of Canada v. Terri Jean Bedford,Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott examined whether these three provisions violate sex worker’s constitutional right to security of the person (protected by s. 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) and freedom of expression (pursuant to s. 2(b) of theCharter).

On December 20, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered a landmark unanimous decision that these provisions contravene the s. 7 security of the person rights of sex workers, and that this violation are not justifiable. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice McLachlin said:The prohibitions at issue do not merely impose conditions on how prostitutes operate. They go a critical step further, by imposing dangerous conditions on prostitution; they prevent people engaged in a risky – but legal – activity from taking steps to protect themselves from the riski

This decision mirrors the arguments made by the Applicants and many of the interveners in this case, including Pivot Legal Society, Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United AgainstViolence Society (SWUAV), PACE Society, Secretariat of theJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS),British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA),Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, British Columbia Centrefor Excellence in HIV/AIDS, HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario,Simone de Beauvoir Institute, and Aboriginal Legal Services ofToronto.i

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/06/13/end-demand-approach-sex-work-doesnt-work/

 

For the last seven years, I’ve been working as an escort in Ottawa and, most recently, in Toronto. I’ve seen approximately 100 unique clients (this does not include repeat clients) per year and not one of them has ever been anything less than respectful.

“End demand” campaigns, like the one suggested in a recent RH Reality Check commentary, are based on the false characterization of clients of sex workers as rapists, and perpetuated by the prostitution-as-violence camp. This is nothing but misogyny, pure and simple.

To suggest that women cannot differentiate between their work and when they have been assaulted is grossly offensive.

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/06/16/prostitution_bill_a_foolish_f...

 

Prostitution bill a foolish fusion of right and left lunacy: DiManno

Men who buy sex are neither “perverts”, as described by Justice Minister Peter MacKay, nor “pathetic,” as described by my usually astute Star columnist colleague Heather Mallick, oft- and self-professed feminist.

I’m a feminist, have always been a feminist, will forever remain a feminist, though no longer find it necessary to bleat and brandish that term as if firing off an F-word fusillade. It’s in my bones, my DNA, my O-positive blood type and every word I’ve ever committed to paper. What I’m most adamantly not is a feminist evangelical who will find concordance and compatibility with preachy prudes, whether the REAL Women subset of Stepford Wives or the do-gooder Agony Aunts pushing condoms and exit strategy, each end of the ideological spectrum stiff and unyielding and witheringly judgmental.

Where doctrinaire feminist meets evangelical moralist is a squishy, fetid place; the underbelly domain of male-on-female coercion and extortion where sex outside of conventional relationships always has a long slithery tail.

Lord save us from the unholy alliance of liberals and illiberals.

Why does sex — the arranging for it, the negotiating of it, the supply and demand economics that drive it — turn even clear-minded thinkers into starchy puritans?

I will not demean men who purchase sexual services as pathetic perverts, smugly assuming they’re either deviant — wanting sex doesn’t make a person creepy — or hapless losers incapable of striking up a “buy ya a drink?” conversation with a potential leg-over partner.

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://becauseimawhore.com/2012/01/28/so-youve-met-a-hooker/

Take a moment now to think about every stereo type you can imagine relating to sex workers. Think of the pretty woman, and the bodies in dumpsters on Law and Order, of high-class call girls, and desperate drug dependant street workers, about sex slaves, pimps and dangerous clients about sex workers childhoods, their reasons for working, their lifestyle. Every stereotypical image you can think of and then some.

I want you to understand that every single time we tell someone that we are a sex worker, we do so knowing the person we tell may have one or all of these assumptions about sex workers. When we tell someone we are a sex worker we risk having  them instantly apply and compare any or all of those stereotypes to us. Imagine how we might feel when we disclose our job to you, or anyone. If its hard for you, it’s hard for us.

Its important that we see that our job doesn’t change anything for you. That you don’t presume anything about us just because we are sex workers. That you don’t judge us. 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Related, from the same blog as above:

 

On why sex work is not 'inherently' violent as some claim:

http://becauseimawhore.com/2011/12/21/up-ya-bum/

 

On the assumptions of sex work:

http://becauseimawhore.com/2011/08/17/sex-as-a-service/

I have been participating around the blogosphere in ‘debates’ where I find myself constantly having to justify my job as a valuable service and needing to fight against the suggestion that I am an exploited victim (with the perpetrator being the employers or clients).  In a way I hope that anyone following my blog for any period of time will be able to come to their own (possibly more informed) conclusions.

...

Many many sex workers, including me, have got experience or training as carers, nurses and support workers in the disability and aged sector. I worked as a carer in my early 20′s both in disability and aged care, in one of my guilt induced, partner enforced ‘retirement’ from the sex industry. Frankly, dealing with naked body’s and natural bodily functions and things that other people find icky, and doing it all while trying to provide a little human care…. it’s not that far of a stretch from sex work. Except – one has way better pay and conditions (but I’ll do a post about that another time)

Anyway, many of us have a caring and compassionate streak, and enjoy those occasions when our work allows us to share with someone something special. For example, a young man with Autism wants to lose his virginity at  age 30, or an old widowed man hasn’t been touched in a gentle caring way for years and wants a sensual massage. Or like my first overnight booking, with a man who was lacking in social skills and confidence and just wanted to wake up next to a woman for the first time in his life. I know a sex worker in her 60′s who only sees clients above 50, and specialises in nursing home visits.

 

 

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

The Passionate Eye, CBC, show from 2012

http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/Shows/The+Passionate+Eye/Full+Documentaries/ID/2314258771/

Scarlet Road

Impassioned about sexual expression, an Australian sex worker specializes in a long overlooked clientele. With humour and passion, she has a dramatic impact on her customers, many of whom are confined to wheelchairs, and who blossom under her attention.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://www.nswp.org/resource/bill-c-36-and-the-views-people-involved-the-canadian-sex-industry

In this brief the authors focus on the findings from their recent national study funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Their research program has drawn together a multi-sectorial team of knowledge users, collaborators, scholars and trainees, many of whom have worked for over two decades to raise public awareness. The team has worked collaboratively to: a) identify key factors that are systematically linked to violence and vulnerabilities in the Canadian sex industry; b) estimate the impact of gender and sexuality on violence-related links between sex workers, clients, romantic partners, supervisors, regulators, and service providers; c) ensure that useful knowledge generated by the research program informs policies and practices aimed at improving the safety and health of sex workers and those they relate to at work and in their personal lives.

The results of the national research, the largest of its kind in Canada, indicate that the main provisions of Bill C-36 will impede the use of safety strategies employed by sex sellers. It is based on false assumptions regarding the makeup of the sex industry in Canada and the experiences and motivations of sellers, their intimate partners/spouses, buyers, and managers. Currently, people involved in the Canadian sex industry are reluctant to contact the police if in danger. Only 22% of the sellers who reported any incidents of victimisation while working in the sex industry in the previous 12 months ever contacted the police and only16% filed a police report in connection with their victimisation. The proposed legislation will make sellers feel even more wary about asking the police for help. The authors of the study recommend instead treating the sex industry as any other industry and regulating it through existing human rights legislation, labour laws, and municipal regulations as a better alternative to the current proposed legislation. They also recommend, as others have internationally, harm reduction and health promotion policies that improve health, safety and wellbeing.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/views-expressed/2014/07/real-exploitation-sex-industry-its-distortion

 

The real exploitation in the sex industry is its distortion

Sex work is a diverse profession. Although sex work takes a variety of forms, the dominant image in the minds of Canadians seems to be street prostitution.

Since the introduction of Bill C-36, The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, media coverage has included the same stock photos: the Red Light District, stilettos boots on a street or young girls in mini-skirts leaning into cars. These standardized images are not new. They circulated in the media long before the Bedford challenge went before the Supreme Court of Canada.

In fact, whenever there has been public discussion of the sex industry these stock photos inevitably reappear. It is within this environment of hackneyed images that Bill C-36 was introduced. The message was clear: the Harper government views sex work as a social ill.

Minister Peter MacKay's press conference furthered this narrative by denouncing sex work as a "degrading activity" and labelled sex workers as "victims" and their clients as "perverts." These invectives deliberately cast the entire industry into a binary framework intended to limit opposition to the bill and to silence the discussion of the complexities and nuances of the sex industry.

It is important to recognize that the sex industry is vastly more complex than current public discourse. Because sex workers may work in a variety of locales: on the street, in massage parlours, for escort agencies, or independently from their homes, there is a spectrum of risks, advantages and cultural environments.

 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

 http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/activist-toolkit/2014/07/finding-community-sex-work-organizing
Finding community in sex work organizing

Quote:
When I moved to Ottawa to be with my partner, after completing a bachelor's degree, I was very isolated, both as someone new to the city and as a sex worker. I didn't have any friends in the city and I certainly didn't know any other sex workers. I was also new to sex work, having only been at it for a few months. I was so out of the loop, I didn't even know there *was* a sex workers' rights movement.


I became very depressed. An acquaintance suggested I get in touch with Nicholas Little, one of the founding members of the sex worker advocacy group POWER (Prostitutes of Ottawa-Gatineau, Work, Educate, Resist). It wasn't until a few months later that I actually attended a POWER meeting. At the meeting, I met other sex workers. I had never spoken about sex work with other sex workers before. They welcomed me into their group and at the first meeting suggested I do a guest lecture in one of Chris Bruckert's classes.Dr. Bruckert was a POWER board member and Criminology professor at the University of Ottawa with a lot of organizing experience -- I felt a little overwhelmed.


 I was new to the sex workers' rights movement and I had never spoken publicly about my experiences. And yet, they believed in me. This was a new feeling to me. I didn't know it at the time, but the folks at POWER would come to be my family. With their support and encouragement, I became even more public about being a sex worker and immersed myself in the world of sex work politics. It wasn't just that they encouraged my activism -- they provided a safe space to talk to other sex workers. I had found a place where sex work was treated as work, where sex workers were considered important members of the community.


They were full of so much knowledge and information -- about working profitably and safely, as well as keeping yourself safe when doing public engagements. I spoke at university classes, wrote op-eds for local newspapers and did radio interviews. Dr. Bruckert inspired me to go back to school, where I did a second bachelor of arts in women's studies at the University of Ottawa. She wrote one of my letters of recommendation to graduate school. When I was accepted, I called her to tell her. During the first semester, when I felt the strange feeling of being in a course called the Global Sex Trade and being a sex worker -- the weird feeling of being the object of study -- she was the person I called. She wrote me a second letter of recommendation when I applied to the PhD program. I was never more excited to tell someone about my successes than her.


Sex work organizing has never made me feel more proud to be a sex worker. Through my work with POWER, I met so many wonderful, brilliant, resilient, strong men and women, all of whom were sex workers. We traded tips and tools of the trade. We supported each other when times were rough. We put on yearly vigils for the International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers. We would read all the names of the men and women who had died that year and we remembered them. We honoured them. In June of 2013 when the Bedford case went to the Supreme Court, the sea of red umbrellas made my heart swell. We drowned out the anti-sex work opposition. Sex workers were being heard and it was amazing.


Even now, with Bill C-36 aiming to destroy the sex industry (and if passed, will certainly kill sex workers), sex workers have never been more organized. Sex workers' rights groups across Canada are speaking to the Justice Committee this week. We held the second National Day of Action on June 14 to protest Bill C-36, and groups across Canada marched in the streets to declare Bill C-36 grossly unconstitutional and dangerous. My Twitter feed was full of solidarity and support.


Sex work organizing, for me, has never been just about fighting for sex workers' rights -- it is also the place where I feel most at home.


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

A new rabble article   http://rabble.ca/news/2014/07/all-sex-workers-will-be-harmed-bill-c-36-yesallsexworkers


Quote:
On June 4, 2014, Justice Minister Peter MacKay introduced Bill C-36, The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act. If passed in its current form, the Bill will criminalize the purchase of sexual services, advertising sexual services, communicating for the purposes of prostitution if youth are in the vicinity and most third party managerial relationships. This Bill was the government's response to the 2013 Supreme Court Canada (AG) v. Bedford decision, which emphasized that the health and safety of sex workers must be a priority in laws and policies governing sex work.

Considering the consequences of the proposed legislation on sex workers' lives, relationships and labour arrangements, people who are currently working in various sex sectors should have been prioritized in the policy development process. Meaningful consultation would have seen many, many more sex workers at the policy table. Such engagement with a diverse range of sex workers could have led to draft legislation that truly responds to their health and safety concerns, which were the issues at the heart of the Supreme Court ruling in Bedford.

Instead, Bill C-36 disregards sex workers' lived experiences, social science evidence and the Supreme Court ruling. Indeed, the proposed laws will continue to violate sex workers' human and labour rights, and will undoubtedly contribute to heightened violence, stigma and discrimination.  That said, different groups of sex workers will be differently impacted if the proposed Bill comes to pass. Below we outline some of the negative legislative implications and explain how sex workers can instead benefit from labour rights and protections.


Pogo
Offline
Joined: Aug 19 2002

asb


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

My thread has changed a bit, in that i can't keep up with all the pro sex work articles by or with sex workers, and that i will post pro sex worker type stories here even tho not by sex workers :)

What really happens under decriminalization in New Zealand

http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11292537

 

Police resolved a dispute between a sex worker and a client who refused to pay — by escorting the man to a cash machine to settle his $100 bill.

The client had refused to pay the woman who had been working on Maich Rd in Manurewa, South Auckland, on Thursday night.

Police settled the matter by driving the man home to get his wallet, taking him to an ATM and then delivering the cash to the worker.

Prostitutes Collective Auckland co-ordinator Annah Pickering was checking on prostitutes in the area and was amazed to see the exchange unfold. "I was parked up and saw it all happen like a movie," Pickering said. "We have heard of this happening in the city anecdotally, but to see it happen in front of you is one in a million."

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

http://scathinglywrongrightwingnutz.blogspot.ca/2014/07/remember-ottawa-cop-who-abused-black.html

......

Back at the Justice Committee hearings, law enforcement witnesses like Chiefs of police supporting C36 were unable to explain why current criminal code sanctions against human trafficking aren't being enforced to stop "procurement" and the enslavement of women into forced sex work through threats, confinement and other brutal methods.  

And the focus of MP Joy Smith's (yes, the MP who hired Vic Toews' mistress) attention at the hearings was riveted upon the horrific, brutal stories told by women who had been trafficked.

Despite numerous fundamentalist religious groups vehemently claiming thousands upon thousands of women are sexually assaulted 10, 20, 30 times daily, very few police investigations, arrests, charges, and prosecutions of human trafficking are being followed through in any rigorous or systematic way.

On the last day of the hearings Christa Big Canoe of the Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto challenged the legal sloppiness of the pro-C36 crowd who used trafficking, and prostituting as synonyms for one and same criminal activity.  

.......

Big Canoe pointed out that last year's Supreme Court ruling known as Bedford dealt specifically with Canada's prostitution laws.
"Bedford was about sex work. It wasn't about trafficking. We have laws in Canada about trafficking that aren't actually being used well. 

 


fortunate
Offline
Joined: Oct 29 2009

Something about language and respect:

http://choice-joyce.blogspot.ca/2014/01/prostituted-words-time-for-new-style.html

 

.....

Words matter. We know they can lead to discrimination, violence and death. The recent tragic suicides of bullied teens attests to that, as well as the existence of hate propaganda laws and media bans on offensive language. Australian researcher Lizzie Smith explains some of the harmful effects of using the word "prostitute":

The term 'prostitute' … brings with it layers of 'knowledge' about her worth, drug status, childhood, integrity, personal hygiene and sexual health. ... This stigma is far-reaching and arguably does more damage to women who work in sex work than the actual work. This stigma feeds into understandings of women that are violence-supporting, and referring to victims of violence as 'prostitutes' continues to 'other' these women and locates them as somehow deserving: she knew the danger. More than that, it feeds into violence-supporting attitudes about all women.

 


Gustave
Offline
Joined: Mar 13 2014

fortunate wrote:
Australian researcher Lizzie Smith explains some of the harmful effects of using the word "prostitute"

Hum.. I wonder what she thinks of "prostituted woman"


onlinediscountanvils
Offline
Joined: Jun 7 2012

This response to Katha Pollitt is more than a month old, but it's been making the rounds today. I don't think it's already been posted in any of these threads, but it's hard to keep track of everything when sex work is being discussed in at least three different forums.

I’m Katha Pollitt’s “Highly Educated” Leftist—And A Sex Trafficking Victim

Let’s be honest: she doesn’t care about my victim credentials, unless I present as a good, sobbing, opinionless victim she can use as trauma porn to promote her own ideas. She doesn’t care that thirty percent of the violence experienced by sex trafficking victims is at the hands of the police, or that according to the Ohio Attorney General’s 2012 Human Trafficking Annual Report, the most common buyers of trafficking victims worked in law enforcement. If she really cared about the voices of “the subaltern,” she would have listened to groups like the Young Women’s Empowerment Project and supported decriminalizing victims of sex trafficking instead of whining that sex work might be seen as normal. Oh, by the way, we do know the difference between sex and a piece of pie: That’s why we charge $300 for one and $3 for the other.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments