dutch diseaseSyndicate content

Image: Wikimedia Commons/Jeffery J. Nichols
| February 14, 2017
Don Getty
| February 15, 2016
1956 Ford Thunderbird
| January 21, 2015
Photo: flickr/Jamie McCaffrey
| December 16, 2014
| December 27, 2013
Photo: Mel Watkins
| October 18, 2013
Christopher Majka and Thomas Mulcair
| May 7, 2013
Jim Stanford
| April 2, 2013
| March 27, 2013
Columnists

Dutch disease is dead, long live Dutch disease!

In the hyper-polarized context of Canadian energy policy debates, even suggesting that there might be a downside to the untrammeled energy boom centred in northern Alberta is enough to get you labelled a traitor or an economic illiterate -- or both. Conservative political leaders in both Ottawa and Edmonton, backed by energy-friendly think-tanks and the Sun media chain, have tried to paint such thinking as idiotic and dangerous, not deserving of serious consideration. This is a distinctly McCarthyist strategy: it relies on vilifying and marginalizing opposition, rather than debating facts and arguments.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.
Syndicate content